1995
DOI: 10.1109/89.365385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of spoken language systems: Research directions for the nineties

Abstract: A spoken language system combines speech recognition, natural language processing and h h a n interface technology. It functions by recognizing the pervn's words, interpreting the sequence of words to obtain a meaning in terms of the application, and providing an appropriate respinse back to the user. Potential applications of spoken lan 8e"systems range from simple tasks, such as retrieving informgo frdm an existing database (traffic reports, airline schedules),$to interactive problem solving tasks involving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, it is not currently known: * How to select relatively "closed" domains, for which the vocabulary and linguistic constructs can be acquired through iterative training and testing on a large corpus of user input * How well users can discern the system's communicative capabilities * How well users can stay within the bounds of those capabilities * What level of task performance users can attain * What level of misinterpretation users will tolerate, and what levels of recognition and understanding are needed for them to solve problems effectively * How much and what kind of training may be acceptable Systems are not adept at handling linguistic coverage problems, other than responding that given words are not in the vocabulary, or that the utterance was not understood. Even recognizing that an out-of-vocabulary word has occurred is itself a difficult issue (54). If users can discern the system's vocabulary, one can be optimistic that they can adapt to that vocabulary.…”
Section: Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, it is not currently known: * How to select relatively "closed" domains, for which the vocabulary and linguistic constructs can be acquired through iterative training and testing on a large corpus of user input * How well users can discern the system's communicative capabilities * How well users can stay within the bounds of those capabilities * What level of task performance users can attain * What level of misinterpretation users will tolerate, and what levels of recognition and understanding are needed for them to solve problems effectively * How much and what kind of training may be acceptable Systems are not adept at handling linguistic coverage problems, other than responding that given words are not in the vocabulary, or that the utterance was not understood. Even recognizing that an out-of-vocabulary word has occurred is itself a difficult issue (54). If users can discern the system's vocabulary, one can be optimistic that they can adapt to that vocabulary.…”
Section: Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a point would have a height potential value if it has more neighbor points close to itself. 3. the point with the highest potential value is selected as le first cluster center: First cluster center x c1 is chosen as the point having the largest density value D c1 4.…”
Section: Subtractive Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms and schemes based on different mathematical paradigms have been proposed in an attempt to improve recognition rates [3,4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classi cation is performed by estimating the maximum a p osteriori probability (MAP) arg max i P( i jO) (12) where i represents the model of word class i and O the observation sequence. The a p osteriori probability can be obtained using Bayes rule ,…”
Section: Speech Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%