2010
DOI: 10.4324/9780203844847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenge of Rethinking History Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
152
0
48

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
152
0
48
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach is to model inclines of challenge in terms of generic cognitive objectives (such as Bloom et al, 1956), an approach that promises to enable curriculum architecture to be constructed primarily in contentless ways and in terms of the types of thinking that a curriculum scaffolds. Another is to posit progression in a subject-specific conceptual manner, in terms of mastery of, for example, the epistemologies that disciplines are held to express, or in terms of the concepts and processes that are held to embody disciplinary thinking (VanSledright, 2011). A third approach is to foreground content as 'core knowledge' approaches do (Cain and Chapman, 2014).…”
Section: Level Of Demand and Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to model inclines of challenge in terms of generic cognitive objectives (such as Bloom et al, 1956), an approach that promises to enable curriculum architecture to be constructed primarily in contentless ways and in terms of the types of thinking that a curriculum scaffolds. Another is to posit progression in a subject-specific conceptual manner, in terms of mastery of, for example, the epistemologies that disciplines are held to express, or in terms of the concepts and processes that are held to embody disciplinary thinking (VanSledright, 2011). A third approach is to foreground content as 'core knowledge' approaches do (Cain and Chapman, 2014).…”
Section: Level Of Demand and Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing consensus in history education research that professional teachers need to possess deep knowledge of their discipline (VanSledright, 2011;Wineburg, 2001). Even in the 1960s, A.…”
Section: Academic Background and Disciplinary Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To look more specifically at this aspect, our study included questions concerning classroom experiences, participants' perspectives on teaching approaches and resources, as well as their visions of school history. Such findings are extremely important because studies suggest that many beginning teachers adopt teaching practices consistent with their familiar learning experiences and the school culture in which they teach (Barton & Levstik, 2003;Cochran-Smith, 2004;VanSledright, 2011 Visit museums and historical sites 6…”
Section: Views On School Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também conhecidos como investigadores "recorta e cola", eles têm estratégias limitadas para julgar as fontes históricas (LEE & ASHBY, 2000;VANSLEDRIGHT, 2011 A escala Likert do QCH contém 6 níveis de concordância/discordância: concorda fortemente (6), concorda (5), concorda um pouco (4), discorda um pouco (3), discorda (2) e discorda fortemente (1). Para medir esta variação, classificamos as respostas dos 18 alunos usando as seguintes equivalências: 6 = +3; 5 = +2; 4 = +1; 3 = -1; 2 = -2; e 1 = -3 (Variação: concorda fortemente = +3 a discorda fortemente = -3).…”
Section: P73unclassified