2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of diabetes home control in COVID-19 times: Proof is in the pudding

Abstract: Highlights COVID-19 pandemic had affected to healthcare assistance for people with diabetes. Data about effect of lockdown in glycemic control in people with diabetes at tome are scarce. Use of glucose monitoring system help people with to diabetes to improve their self-care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in food intake (one-third), a higher proportion of less physical activity than usual (two-thirds) and the high prevalence of increased weight may explain the high percentage of people with T1D reporting a worsening of glycaemic control during confinement. Two recent studies in Spain in PLWT1D using FGM reported no deterioration in glycaemic control resulting from the lockdown enforced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic [8] , [9] . However, this study was conducted using a smaller portion of the population using FGM; therefore, the results may not be applicable to the global population of people with T1D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in food intake (one-third), a higher proportion of less physical activity than usual (two-thirds) and the high prevalence of increased weight may explain the high percentage of people with T1D reporting a worsening of glycaemic control during confinement. Two recent studies in Spain in PLWT1D using FGM reported no deterioration in glycaemic control resulting from the lockdown enforced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic [8] , [9] . However, this study was conducted using a smaller portion of the population using FGM; therefore, the results may not be applicable to the global population of people with T1D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regarding glycaemic control, in T1D, using flash glucose monitoring, glycaemic control improved in those who stopped working during the lockdown in Italy [7] . In Spain [8] , [9] , despite the limitations of lockdown, glycaemic control improved in patients with T1D, suggesting that having more time for self-management may help improve glycaemic control in the short term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled estimate showed no significant differences in RBG level between pre-and during lockdown period (MD=0.91 mg/dL [95%CI -4.52 to 6.34], I 2 =88%, random-effects). RBG sub-group analysis presented no significant differences on cohort studies (MD=-0.71 mg/dL [95%CI -7.64 to 6.22], I 2 =0.64%, random-effects) [9,22,[30][31][32], case-control studies (MD=-2.47 mg/dL [95%CI -8.91 to 3.98], I 2 =75%, random-effects) [24,26,27,33], and cross-sectional studies (MD=23.61 mg/dL (95%CI -15.32 to 62.54, I 2 =93%, random-effects) [28,29,34].…”
Section: Random Blood Glucose (Rbg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of eleven studies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] with 1357 pre-lockdown and 1325 lockdown total participants, consisting of T1D and T2D patients, reported the mean level of HbA1c and estimated A1c which obtained either from CGM or FGM (Figure 2). A pooled estimate showed that lockdown did not significantly give rise to changes in HbA1c parameter (MD=0.06% [95%CI -0.10 to 0.23], I 2 =77%, random-effects).…”
Section: Primary Outcomes Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (Hba1c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation