2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-5127-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of climate change and policy response in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently as well as historical energy consumption pattern suggests that energy growth rate shall persist at an annual growth rate of 8.8% which would require 361 million tons of oil equivalent (MTOE) of energy by 2030. In other words, Pakistan has to enhance energy production by almost six times to that of the supply level of 2010-2011 (64 MTOE) [39].…”
Section: Historical Energy Demand and Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently as well as historical energy consumption pattern suggests that energy growth rate shall persist at an annual growth rate of 8.8% which would require 361 million tons of oil equivalent (MTOE) of energy by 2030. In other words, Pakistan has to enhance energy production by almost six times to that of the supply level of 2010-2011 (64 MTOE) [39].…”
Section: Historical Energy Demand and Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, Pakistan has to enhance energy production by almost six times to that of the supply level of 2010-2011 (64 MTOE) [39]. There have been some efforts from the Government of Pakistan (GoP) to promote the adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs).…”
Section: Historical Energy Demand and Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Pakistan, climate change poses a major risk to achieving the social, economic or environmental sustainable development goals (Khan et al 2016;Government of Pakistan 2012). Disasters in the recent past have, for example, had far-reaching implications on the food security of the country in terms of reduction in crop production and harmful effects on livestock health (Task Force on Climate Change 2010).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the estimated figure is 1066 m 3 /capita in 2015. ).Improving laws linked to the introduction of missing water valuation, surface water quality impacts due to climate change, groundwater challenges, and pollution control through awareness raising, and implementation of policies regarding water storage, water conservation, integrated water resources management, capacity building, and awareness raising that should be encouraged at various levels by introducing fines to reduce water scarcity and pollution problems should be encouraged [94,95]. …”
Section: Approaches To Diminish Water-related Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provision of more funds for research in biotechnology supporting the introduction of specific heat resistant, flood (or drought) tolerant, water efficient, and high yield crop varieties; adaptation of better strategies like water channels to conserve water by minimizing water evaporation and transpiration, water reuse strategies after consuming or using water, dam construction to enable water storage; minimizing the effects of water-related impacts of climate change on agriculture and health; and ensuring both water and food security [94]. Provision of funds to establish climate change research centers in agricultural departments to support highly efficient technologies to save labor and to increase yields along with optimized pollution control in the agriculture sector under changing climate scenarios is encouraged [95].…”
Section: Approaches To Diminish Water-related Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%