Abstract:Background
Physician burnout is a common problem that can have negative ramifications for both physicians and patients. Lack of effective coping mechanisms decreases resilience, which can lead to burnout, and women may be particularly vulnerable.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate resilience by generation among professionals in dermatology. We hope to gain a better understanding of the plasticity of resilience traits to identify modifiable resilience components.
… Show more
“…We found that Generation Z participants demonstrated lower resilience in comparison with Generation X participants. This finding is consistent with past findings indicating that young people are less resilient than older people (Cohen et al, 2016 ; Ludwig et al, 2020 ; Gooding et al, 2012 ). However, a review of the literature indicates that resilience is domain dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies of Gen Z have shown that, compared with previous generations, even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic Gen Zs exhibited higher rates of depression and anxiety, and a need for emotional support (Schroth, 2019 ). Past studies show that younger generations are less resilient than older generations (Ludwig et al, 2020 ; Gooding et al, 2012 (. However, it is not known why older people are shown to be more resilient in times of crisis.…”
In the current study we seek to examine the difference between Generation Z and Generation X in terms of coping with a global crisis (COVID-19), specifically regarding resilience in times of crisis, personal values and attitudes during that time. Based on the theory of generations, we aimed to explore whether different generations have different levels of resilience, values and attitudes during the global crisis. Data were gathered in a cross-sectional study; 958 participants participated, divided into two age-groups: 508 participants of Generation Z (ages ranged between 18–24; 53.9% males [Age:
M
= 21.05,
SD
= 1.96]; 46.1% females [Age:
M
= 21.14,
SD
= 1.83]), and 205 participants of Generation X (ages ranged between 40–50; 54.2% males [Age:
M
= 45.16,
SD
= 3.15]; 45.8% females [Age:
M
= 45.23,
SD
= 3.01]). It was found that members of Generation Z (Gen Z) were less resilient. Also, Gen Z members had higher levels of openness to change, and self-enhancement as compared to Generation X (Gen X). In addition, Gen Z were found to be more positive in their attitudes toward flexible learning but no differences between the generations were found as for flexible work. Both generation members had the similar attitudes towards online consumption. Despite the magnitude and significance of the crisis, the main values of each generation remained unchanged in many respects, but attitudes of both generations are positive towards hybrid work and consumption.
“…We found that Generation Z participants demonstrated lower resilience in comparison with Generation X participants. This finding is consistent with past findings indicating that young people are less resilient than older people (Cohen et al, 2016 ; Ludwig et al, 2020 ; Gooding et al, 2012 ). However, a review of the literature indicates that resilience is domain dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies of Gen Z have shown that, compared with previous generations, even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic Gen Zs exhibited higher rates of depression and anxiety, and a need for emotional support (Schroth, 2019 ). Past studies show that younger generations are less resilient than older generations (Ludwig et al, 2020 ; Gooding et al, 2012 (. However, it is not known why older people are shown to be more resilient in times of crisis.…”
In the current study we seek to examine the difference between Generation Z and Generation X in terms of coping with a global crisis (COVID-19), specifically regarding resilience in times of crisis, personal values and attitudes during that time. Based on the theory of generations, we aimed to explore whether different generations have different levels of resilience, values and attitudes during the global crisis. Data were gathered in a cross-sectional study; 958 participants participated, divided into two age-groups: 508 participants of Generation Z (ages ranged between 18–24; 53.9% males [Age:
M
= 21.05,
SD
= 1.96]; 46.1% females [Age:
M
= 21.14,
SD
= 1.83]), and 205 participants of Generation X (ages ranged between 40–50; 54.2% males [Age:
M
= 45.16,
SD
= 3.15]; 45.8% females [Age:
M
= 45.23,
SD
= 3.01]). It was found that members of Generation Z (Gen Z) were less resilient. Also, Gen Z members had higher levels of openness to change, and self-enhancement as compared to Generation X (Gen X). In addition, Gen Z were found to be more positive in their attitudes toward flexible learning but no differences between the generations were found as for flexible work. Both generation members had the similar attitudes towards online consumption. Despite the magnitude and significance of the crisis, the main values of each generation remained unchanged in many respects, but attitudes of both generations are positive towards hybrid work and consumption.
“…There are prevalent beliefs about the existence of generation differences in work engagement in the workplace. Although research has shown that differences between work engagement and meaningful work amongst generational cohorts exist, results are still inconclusive as much research conducted was focused on the retiring cohort of Baby Boomers and Generation X [ 10 ]. Hence, further evidence is required to identify generational differences in work values, engagement, and satisfaction among the present nursing workforce.…”
Background
The present nursing workforce comprises four generational of nurses working side–by–side. While such a generation blend adds invaluable diversity to the workforce, it also brings added complexity. The study aimed to describe and summarise work values and attitudes of four nursing generations, namely Baby boomers, Generation X, Y and Z.
Method
A cross-sectional questionnaire study was adopted. A total of 778 nurses from an acute hospital in Singapore completed the online questionnaire. The Work Value and Attitude scale measuring seven constructs (Work Centrality, Non-compliance, Technology Challenge, Work life balance, leadership, Power, and Recognition) was employed for data collection.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.714 for the overall instrument. Statistically significant differences amongst the four generations of nurses emerged in the Work Value and Attitude scale in the construct of non-compliance (p = 0.007), technology challenge (p = 0.027), work-life balance (p < 0.001), and recognition (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted for the rest of the constructs.
Discussion and conclusion
The findings of this study highlight that differences in work values and attitudes exist among nurses of different generations. Generation X are less likely to challenge the conventional norm and supervisors. Generation Y and Z are the most tech-savvy generations and can adapt quickly to new technology. There is also a greater emphasis on work-life balance as the generation gets younger. Generation Y and Z nurses perceived that younger nurses do not get due respect and recognition from their colleagues. Acknowledging the generational differences in work values and attitudes can facilitate nursing management to tailor strategies to improve individual and organisation performance while creating a work environment that enhances intergeneration harmony and teamwork.
“…The present nursing workforce comprises four generational cohorts that possesses unique values and traits. The nursing professional at a generational crossroad is experiencing an increasing share of nursing workforce predominated by Generation Y/Millennials born between the years 1994 and 1980, and Generation Z born between years 1995 to 2015 [8,9]. Existing generations of the nurses include Baby Boomers born between the years 1944 to 1964, and Generation X, born between 1965 to 1979.…”
Background:
The present nursing workforce comprises four generational of nurses working side-by–side. While such generation blend adds invaluable diversity to the workforce, it also brings added complexity. The study aimed to describe and summarise work values and attitudes of four nursing generations, namely Baby boomers, Generation X, Y and Z.
Method:
A cross-sectional questionnaire study was adopted. A total of 778 nurses from an acute hospital in Singapore had completed the online questionnaire. The Work Value and Attitude scale measuring seven constructs (Work Centrality, Non-compliance, Technology Challenge, Work life balance, leadership, Power, and Recognition) was employed for data collection.
Results:
The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.714 for the overall instrument. Statistically significant differences amongst the four generations of nurses emerged in the Work Value and Attitude scale in the construct of non-compliance (p=0.007), technology challenge (p=0.027), work-life balance (p<0.001), and recognition (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences noted for the rest of the constructs.
Discussion and Conclusion:
The findings of this study highlights that differences in work values and attitudes exist amongst nurses of different generations. Generation-X are less likely to challenge the conventional norm and supervisors. Generation Y and Z are the most tech-savvy generations and can adapt quicker to new technology. There is also greater emphasis for work-life balance as the generation gets younger. Generation Y and Z nurses perceived that younger nurses do not get the due respect and recognition form their colleagues. Acknowledging the generational differences in work values and attitude can facilitate nursing management to tailor strategies to improve individual and organisation performance while creating a work environment that enhance intergeneration harmony and teamwork.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.