Handbook of Research on Customer Equity in Marketing 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781781004982.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chain of effects from customer satisfaction to customer profitability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar finding was reported by Dawi et al, who found a significant association between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions to pay for services [61]. In another study, Keiningham et al argued that higher customer satisfaction does not always mean higher financial performance and described the association between the two variables as being complex [62]. According to Homburg, Koschate, and Hoyer, analyzing the variables that can mediate the relationship is essential to understand this association, as customers who pay more will result in a higher profitability [60].…”
Section: Service Quality and Intention To Pay Moresupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A similar finding was reported by Dawi et al, who found a significant association between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions to pay for services [61]. In another study, Keiningham et al argued that higher customer satisfaction does not always mean higher financial performance and described the association between the two variables as being complex [62]. According to Homburg, Koschate, and Hoyer, analyzing the variables that can mediate the relationship is essential to understand this association, as customers who pay more will result in a higher profitability [60].…”
Section: Service Quality and Intention To Pay Moresupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This study explored which pricing plan would be preferable for customers, among the $30, $45, $60, and over $60 price ranges. Generally, price and customer satisfaction are closely linked to each other, leading to higher customer satisfaction with a lower-price offer (Keiningham et al, 2014). This general idea was supported in this study with the finding that the preference for lower price ranges with $30 (utility=119.59), $45 (utility=44.61), $60 (utility=-67.51), and over $60 (utility=-96.69) in the descending order.…”
Section: Price Attributesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We could expect that customer orientation is ultimately contributing to CRM success through increasing SOW (as reflected in Hypothesis 1c., Dorsch et al 1998: 132), also noting the anticipated positive SOWprofitability link (e.g. Garland 2004;Larivière 2008;Mittal et al 2001;Keiningham et al 2015a), and building on the observed relationship between customer orientation and profitability (e.g. Narver et al 1990).…”
Section: Customer Orientationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…repurchasing) and business performance (e.g. profitability) i s widely supported (e.g., Keränen et al 2013;Keiningham et al 2015a). More specifically, on the basis of previous theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence, more recent work proposes that SOW be substituted in place of intentions in the chain of effects from customer satisfaction to customer profitability, such that the chain is expected to go from satisfaction to SOW to revenue to profit (Anderson et al 2000;Mittal et al 2001;Keiningham et al 2015a: 269, Figure 11.2.).…”
Section: Behavioral Loyalty and Profitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%