2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ChAdOx1 vectored vaccine, AZD2816, induces strong immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 beta (B.1.351) and other variants of concern in preclinical studies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was determined based on our previous experience and articles assessing the immunogenicity of adenoviral vectors that had displayed 4 mice per group gives 80% power to detect a two-fold change in T cell or antibody responses. 62 Group sizes were increased to 8 for BALB/c mice to compensate for the potential loss from the development of spontaneous neoplasia which are common in BALB/c mice and unrelated to the experimental procedures. Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was determined based on our previous experience and articles assessing the immunogenicity of adenoviral vectors that had displayed 4 mice per group gives 80% power to detect a two-fold change in T cell or antibody responses. 62 Group sizes were increased to 8 for BALB/c mice to compensate for the potential loss from the development of spontaneous neoplasia which are common in BALB/c mice and unrelated to the experimental procedures. Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the homologous prime/boost of these 2 approved vaccines groups, each was given at four weeks interval. The 4-week gap was used according to the preclinical study protocol of ChAdOX-vectored vaccines 65 , 66 . The goal of experiment 2 was to assess the potential role of ChulaCov19 as a booster in a setting of heterologous primed with other COVID-19 vaccine platforms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reason for these small differences appeared to be the level of genetic similarity (homology) between the vaccine antigen and the targeted antibody responses, with the response being more robust when the antigen matches the specific variant. Other studies have also observed strain-specific differential neutralizing responses when comparing the neutralizing capacity induced by Wuhan-Hu-1-specific vaccines with that of variant-adapted vaccine analogs ( 30 , 53 , 56 , 57 ). For example, in Syrian hamsters vaccinated with two IM doses of a multi-antigenic COVID-19 Wuhan-Hu-1-S-specific vaccine candidate based on a synthetic MVA (sMVA) vector or its beta-adapted vaccine analog, it was reported a similar neutralizing activity against the ancestral Wuhan virus in both immunization groups but a higher neutralizing activity against beta and delta variants in hamsters vaccinated with the beta-analog compared with hamsters vaccinated with the COVID-19 Wuhan-Hu-1-specific vaccine candidate ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These results suggest that although approved COVID-19 vaccines can prevent hospitalization and death caused by VoCs, a variant-specific vaccine could ensure better protection against disease and beyond transmission. Therefore, recent research has focused on studying the ability of variant-adapted vaccine analogs to protect against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and/or SARS-CoV-2 VoCs in different animal models ( 28 , 30 , 31 , 55 57 ). We previously reported that immunization with one or two doses of an MVA-based vaccine candidate expressing a human codon-optimized full-length Wuhan-related SARS-CoV-2 S protein, MVA-S, induced robust titers of S- and RBD-binding IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies against parental SARS-CoV-2 and VoCs alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and to a lesser extent to omicron, either in mice ( 35 37 ), hamsters ( 39 ) or non-human primates ( 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%