1978
DOI: 10.1093/ilj/7.1.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Central Arbitration Committee's Approach to Schedule 11 to the Employment Protection Act 1975 and the Fair Wages Resolution 1946

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes that echo those reported in a number of other studies (see e.g. Cunningham and James, 2014;Pennycook, 2013;Rubery and Urwin, 2011; and which highlight a symmetry with the New Right rationales that informed the externalisation policies of the Thatcher and Major governments, as well as those subsequently pursued by the post-1997 New Labour, Coalition and Conservative governments (Thompson, 2007), and the labour market reforms that were introduced to support them, such as the FWR (Bercusson, 1978), and the repeal of schedule 11 of the Employment Protection Act 1975 (Wood, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes that echo those reported in a number of other studies (see e.g. Cunningham and James, 2014;Pennycook, 2013;Rubery and Urwin, 2011; and which highlight a symmetry with the New Right rationales that informed the externalisation policies of the Thatcher and Major governments, as well as those subsequently pursued by the post-1997 New Labour, Coalition and Conservative governments (Thompson, 2007), and the labour market reforms that were introduced to support them, such as the FWR (Bercusson, 1978), and the repeal of schedule 11 of the Employment Protection Act 1975 (Wood, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It further stipulated that, in the absence of such trade or industry based provisions, those provided should be no less favourable ‘than the general level of wages, hours and conditions observed by other employers whose general circumstances in the trade or industry in which the contractor is engaged are similar’. Furthermore, by virtue of Schedule 11 of the Employment Protection Act 1975, its requirements were effectively extended across the whole economy through provisions which enabled complaints to be brought on the grounds that an employer was failing to observe ‘recognised terms and conditions’, or, where no such provisions existed, relevant ‘general’ ones (Wood, 1978). The removal of these provisions served to avoid the potential difficulties they created for external, and often non-unionised, providers who wanted to depart significantly from the terms and conditions negotiated nationally in the local authority sector (Atkinson and Lucas, 2013; Cunningham, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%