2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The central active site arginine in sulfite oxidizing enzymes alters kinetic properties by controlling electron transfer and redox interactions

Abstract: A central conserved arginine, first identified as a clinical mutation leading to sulfite oxidase deficiency, is essential for catalytic competency of sulfite oxidizing molybdoenzymes, but the molecular basis for its effects on turnover and substrate affinity have not been fully elucidated. We have used a bacterial sulfite dehydrogenase, SorT, which lacks an internal heme group, but transfers electrons to an external, electron accepting cytochrome, SorU, to investigate the molecular functions of this arginine r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arg206 acts as a “fork” holding the pathway in place or possibly directly facilitating an ET pathway. Interestingly, arginine residues are often involved in controlling biomolecular ET pathways. The overall hydroxylation mechanism proposed here has some similarities with 1- H -3-hydroxy-4-oxoquinaldine 2,4-dioxygenase that oxygenates substrates without the need for a cofactor and those proposed for bacterial luciferase involving formation of a radical pair and subsequent ET(s) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Arg206 acts as a “fork” holding the pathway in place or possibly directly facilitating an ET pathway. Interestingly, arginine residues are often involved in controlling biomolecular ET pathways. The overall hydroxylation mechanism proposed here has some similarities with 1- H -3-hydroxy-4-oxoquinaldine 2,4-dioxygenase that oxygenates substrates without the need for a cofactor and those proposed for bacterial luciferase involving formation of a radical pair and subsequent ET(s) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The combined loss of positive charge and H‐bonding capacity of the residue at position 78 lead to decreased activity of the Mo active site for sulfite oxidation. A parallel study of the effects of these mutations on the solution steady state kinetics of SorT reveals similar trends …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Recombinant wild type Sinorhizobium meliloti sulfite dehydrogenase (SorT WT ) and its variants (SorT R78Q , SorT R78K and SorT R78M ) as well as the c ‐type cytochrome SorU from were purified following expression in E. coli as previously described ,,. Sodium sulfite, chitosan (from shrimp shells, ≥75 % deacetylated) and 3‐mercaptopropionic acid were purchased from Aldrich and were used as received.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a membrane-bound molybdoenzyme (five transmembrane helices) bearing resemblance to the well-characterized SoxC subunit of sulfane dehydrogenase from Paracoccus pantotrophus ( 33 ). The most similar structurally characterized proteins are the SorA subunit of Starkeya novella sulfite dehydrogenase ( 34 ), followed by P. pantotrophus SoxC and SorT sulfite dehydrogenase from Sinorhizobium meliloti ( 35 ). Moreover, IGTS8_peg446 encodes a putative membrane protein YeiH with 11 transmembrane helices that is 28% identical to a YeiH family sulfate exporter ( TDL75784 ) from R .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%