2003
DOI: 10.1080/00185860309598019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Proposal to Pay for Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process measures, such as prophylactic antibiotic administration for patients having total joint arthroplasty, are already being used in some surgical quality initiatives 29, 30. Because most process measures are performed by the surgeon or therapist directly, or under his/her direct supervision, they are considered as “fair” quality measures compared to structural measures, which are often outside of surgeons’ or therapists’ control 28.…”
Section: Measuring Surgical Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Process measures, such as prophylactic antibiotic administration for patients having total joint arthroplasty, are already being used in some surgical quality initiatives 29, 30. Because most process measures are performed by the surgeon or therapist directly, or under his/her direct supervision, they are considered as “fair” quality measures compared to structural measures, which are often outside of surgeons’ or therapists’ control 28.…”
Section: Measuring Surgical Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program uses a classic pay-for-performance model. Core performance measures were developed in areas such as acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, heart failure, community-acquired pneumonia and hip and knee replacement 29. Quality in these areas was based almost exclusively on process measures.…”
Section: Applications Of Quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(16) Hence, in 2003, when the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a pay-for-performance initiative, this was met by skepticism, anger, and, predictably, disinterest among many specialty societies. (17) These feeling were particularly prevalent in certain surgical societies who feel that the metrics used for measuring quality in surgical care are not accurate, and the payment for participation in these quality of care initiatives are meager at best to justify support. (18)…”
Section: Recent Initiatives To Assess Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Hence, in 2003, when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced a pay-for-performance initiative, this was met by skepticism, anger, and lack of interest among many specialty societies. 17 These feeling were particularly prevalent in certain surgical societies that believe the metrics used for measuring quality in surgical care are not accurate, and the payment for participation in these quality-of-care initiatives is meager at best to justify support. 18…”
Section: Recent Initiatives To Assess Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%