Early adversity, in the form of abuse, neglect, socioeconomic status, and
other adverse experiences, is associated with poor physical and mental health
outcomes. To understand the biologic mechanisms underlying these associations,
studies have evaluated the relationship between early adversity and telomere
length, a marker of cellular senescence. Such results have varied in regards to
the size and significance of this relationship. Using meta-analytic techniques,
we aimed to clarify the relationship between early adversity and telomere length
while exploring factors affecting the association, including adversity type,
timing, and study design. A comprehensive search in July 2016 of PubMed/MEDLINE,
PsycINFO, and Web of Science identified 2 462 studies. Multiple reviewers
appraised studies for inclusion or exclusion using a priori
criteria; 3.9% met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted into a
structured form; the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality, validity and
bias. Forty-one studies (N =30 773) met inclusion criteria. Early
adversity and telomere length were significantly associated (Cohen’s
d effect size = −0.35; 95% CI,
–0.46 to –0.24, p < 0.0001).
Sensitivity analyses revealed no outlier effects. Adversity type and timing
significantly impacted the association with telomere length (p
< .0001 and p = .0025, respectively). Subgroup
and meta-regression analyses revealed that medication use, medical or
psychiatric conditions, case-control versus longitudinal study design,
methodological factors, age and smoking significantly affected the relationship.
Comprehensive evaluations of adversity demonstrated more extensive telomere
length changes. These results suggest that early adversity may have long-lasting
physiological consequences contributing to disease risk and biological
aging.