1996
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.134.6.1543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cell density factor CMF regulates the chemoattractant receptor cAR1 in Dictyostelium.

Abstract: Binding of ~200 molecules of CMF to starved cells affects the affinity of the majority of the cAR1 cAMP receptors within 2 min, indicating that an amplifying mechanism allows one activated CMF receptor to regulate many cARs. In cells lacking the G-protein 13 subunit, cAMP induces a loss of cAMP binding, but not CMF binding, while CMF induces a reduction of CMF binding without affecting cAMP binding, suggesting that the linkage of the cell density-sensing CMF receptor and the chemoattractant cAMP receptor is th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are about 4 ϫ 10 4 receptors on Dictyostelium cells for the glycoprotein cell density-sensing factor CMF and an equal number of receptors for the chemoattractant cAMP (45)(46)(47), there appear to be only ϳ53 receptors for countin (18) and ϳ56 receptors for CF50. Similarly low numbers of receptors have been observed in many other systems (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are about 4 ϫ 10 4 receptors on Dictyostelium cells for the glycoprotein cell density-sensing factor CMF and an equal number of receptors for the chemoattractant cAMP (45)(46)(47), there appear to be only ϳ53 receptors for countin (18) and ϳ56 receptors for CF50. Similarly low numbers of receptors have been observed in many other systems (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetative cells have little CMF binding and few cAMP receptors, whereas starved cells possess about 40,000 receptors for CMF and cAMP. Transformants overexpressing cAR1 show a 10-fold increase of cAMP binding and a similar increase of CMF binding; disruption of the cAR1 gene abolishes both cAMP and CMF binding (22). In wild-type cells, high levels of cAMP down-regulate both cAMP and CMF binding, and CMF similarly down-regulates both cAMP and CMF binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Binding of roughly 200 molecules of CMF to starved cells affects the affinity of the majority of the 40 000 cARls within 2 min, indicating that the linkage involves an amplifying mechanism. In cells lacking G|3, cAMP induces a loss of cAMP binding but not CMF binding, while CMF induces a reduction of CMF binding without affecting cAMP binding, suggesting that the linkage between the CMF and cAMP signal transduction pathways is through a G protein [22]. Cells lacking CMF have normal levels of cARl, cAMP-induced binding of GTP or GTP-yS to membranes, and GTPyS modulatable cAMP binding, suggesting that the interaction of the cAMP receptor with G proteins in vitro is not measurably affected by CMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activations of Ca 2+ influx, adenylyl cyclase, and guanylyl cyclase in response to a pulse of cAMP are strongly inhibited in cells lacking CMF, but are restored by a 10 s exposure of the cells to CMF. Down-regulation of cARl with high levels of cAMP also down-regulates CMF binding [21], and CMF similarly downregulates cAMP and CMF binding, indicating a linkage between the two signal transduction systems [22]. Binding of roughly 200 molecules of CMF to starved cells affects the affinity of the majority of the 40 000 cARls within 2 min, indicating that the linkage involves an amplifying mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%