2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0443-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of leukemias

Abstract: The inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in the treatment of cancers has recently reached an exciting stage with several cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors that are now being tested in several clinical trials in cancer patients. Although the great amount of pre-clinical and clinical data are from the solid tumor experience, only few studies have been done on leukemias using specific cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors. This review aims to summarize the most recent data found on the biological mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as indicated by their ability to prevent digestion of plasmid DNA with BamHI restriction nuclease, the studied chromanone/flavanone analogues appear to be capable of intercalating with genomic DNA of cancer cells, thus leading to cell damage and ultimately apoptosis. It is noteworthy that commercially-used anticancer drugs, such as docetaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin or etoposide, are also known to arrest the cycle of cancer cells in the G2/M phase [32][33][34]. Our findings correspond closely with those of previous reports on the cell cycle distribution in HL-60 cells following treatment with cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, as indicated by their ability to prevent digestion of plasmid DNA with BamHI restriction nuclease, the studied chromanone/flavanone analogues appear to be capable of intercalating with genomic DNA of cancer cells, thus leading to cell damage and ultimately apoptosis. It is noteworthy that commercially-used anticancer drugs, such as docetaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin or etoposide, are also known to arrest the cycle of cancer cells in the G2/M phase [32][33][34]. Our findings correspond closely with those of previous reports on the cell cycle distribution in HL-60 cells following treatment with cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nonetheless, it is effective in only a subset of patients, highlighting the urgent clinical need of searching new therapeutic approaches for a larger number of OC patients.While the first generation of antimitotic drugs aimed at blocking cell division (classical antimicrotubule agents), the new generation is exploiting novel cancer-specific vulnerabilities such as the generated chromosomal instability (CIN) [19]. CIN-inducing cancer therapies target mitotic-specific alterations such as centrosome amplification or overexpressed checkpoint regulators to adversely impact in chromosome segregation, triggering cell death and thus trying to maximize clinical results [20,21]. Some of them, focused on the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint (e.g., PLK1, WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase (WEE1) or telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM)) are being investigated clinically in many cancers with promising results [22][23][24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of a damage that were activated in normal hemotopoesis cells, the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) played a central role in the activation of the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint, preventing cells with damaged DNA from starting the S phase. 16 There was an abnormality in activity of ALL checkpoint. The gene abnormality that caused expression of cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs) disrupted so it could make a loss of cell cycle checkpoint control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%