2018
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Abstract: BackgroundRecent studies have favored the use of cefazolin over nafcillin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. The clinical influence of the cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE) in the effectiveness of cephalosporins for severe MSSA infections has not been evaluated.MethodsWe prospectively included patients from 3 Argentinian hospitals with S. aureus bacteremia. Cefazolin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined at standard (105 colony-forming units … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
69
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
69
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There remains a current debate over the most appropriate β-lactam to treat serious MSSA infections, with CFZ or OXA as the primary candidates (25, 39); most recent MSSA bacteremia studies appear to favor CFZ (16, 26, 27). Further, on balancing adverse events vs efficacy metrics, CFZ is generally regarded as a safer option, due to its decreased renal toxicity risk as compared to the antistaphylococcal penicillins (16, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There remains a current debate over the most appropriate β-lactam to treat serious MSSA infections, with CFZ or OXA as the primary candidates (25, 39); most recent MSSA bacteremia studies appear to favor CFZ (16, 26, 27). Further, on balancing adverse events vs efficacy metrics, CFZ is generally regarded as a safer option, due to its decreased renal toxicity risk as compared to the antistaphylococcal penicillins (16, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, on balancing adverse events vs efficacy metrics, CFZ is generally regarded as a safer option, due to its decreased renal toxicity risk as compared to the antistaphylococcal penicillins (16, 27). However, there remains concern about CFZ efficacy in “high-inoculum” S. aureus infections (e.g., endocarditis) due to the potential for the undetected presence and induction of genes for Types A or C cephalosporinases that hydrolyze CFZ (39, 40). In our current study, CFZ appeared to be unaffected by the high inoculum within SEVs, at least for the NaHCO 3 -responsive strains, 11-11 and MW2, with excellent CFZ bactericidal activity obtained despite starting inocula ≥ 1×10 8 CFU/g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cefazolin is considered to be an acceptable alternative in patients who are unable to tolerate antistaphylococcal penicillins [2, 4]. However, use of cefazolin has previously been associated with treatment failure, including infections caused by isolates exhibiting a cefazolin inoculum effect in vitro [20, 21]. Impact of this inoculum effect on clinical outcomes may also depend on the local prevalence of isolates displaying the cefazolin inoculum effect [22, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ceftriaxone in the initial management of MSSA bacteraemia is controversial given the potential severity of the condition and the limited available clinical evidence to support its use [9]. A multi-centre prospective clinical study of 77 patients treated with the narrow-spectrum anti-staphylococcal cephalosporin, cefazolin, for MSSA bacteraemia, reported an association between the cefazolin-induced inoculum effect and increased 30-day mortality [10]. Whether these concerns are clinically significant or generalisable to ceftriaxone is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%