2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09113-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The causes of spatiotemporal variations in erupted fluxes and compositions along a volcanic arc

Abstract: Decades of study on volcanic arcs have provided insight into the overarching processes that control magmatism, and how these processes manifest at individual volcanoes. However, the causes of ubiquitous and dramatic intra-arc variations in volcanic flux and composition remain largely unresolved. Investigating such arc-scale issues requires greater quantitative comparison of geophysical and geochemical data, linked through sets of common intensive variables. To work towards these goals, we use observed lava com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns are observed in surface heat flow measurements (Ingebritsen & Mariner 2010), with higher heat flow in the southern Cascades. These correlations are identified and analysed by Till et al (2019), who show that quantitative agreement exists between our 10-60 s phase velocities and average surface heat flow, erupted volcanic volumes, and the petrologically estimated magmatic heat budget along the entire Cascades arc. These correlations are strongest from 20 to 60 s, the period range primarily sensitive to lower crustal and upper-mantle structure.…”
Section: The Cascades Volcanic Arcmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar patterns are observed in surface heat flow measurements (Ingebritsen & Mariner 2010), with higher heat flow in the southern Cascades. These correlations are identified and analysed by Till et al (2019), who show that quantitative agreement exists between our 10-60 s phase velocities and average surface heat flow, erupted volcanic volumes, and the petrologically estimated magmatic heat budget along the entire Cascades arc. These correlations are strongest from 20 to 60 s, the period range primarily sensitive to lower crustal and upper-mantle structure.…”
Section: The Cascades Volcanic Arcmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This observation suggests that heat input from magma input in the lower crust and upper mantle associated with extrusive volcanism drives the heating throughout the arc crust. The correlation at 40-60 s implies that the variation in temperature and perhaps melt content extends into the mantle wedge supporting vertically connected arc magmatism, with higher extents of heating and/or melt content in the southern Cascades (Till et al 2019). At periods longer than 60 s, where peak sensitivities are at >100 km depth, these data sets are more weakly correlated.…”
Section: The Cascades Volcanic Arcmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To quantify the extent to which composition explains the lateral velocity variations of the lower crust, we calculate Vs at a range of temperatures consistent with surface heat flow for Siletz gabbro compositions, following the calculation of Till et al (). Forearc heat flow of 34 ± 4 mW/m 2 (see the supporting information) is extrapolated to midcrustal depths for an assumed thermal conductivity of 2.0 ± 0.5 W/m/K (Pollack et al, ; van Keken et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forearc heat flow of 34 ± 4 mW/m 2 (see the supporting information) is extrapolated to midcrustal depths for an assumed thermal conductivity of 2.0 ± 0.5 W/m/K (Pollack et al, ; van Keken et al, ). Heat production in gabbros should be negligible and the crust appears to be in thermal steady state so a linear geotherm is appropriate (Till et al, ). The resulting temperatures are then used to calculate Vs at depth in the forearc from petrologic models (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation