2002
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Causes and Consequences of Ant Invasions

Abstract: Key Words ants, biological invasion, indirect effects, interspecific competitions Abstract Invasions by non-native ants are an ecologically destructive phenomenon affecting both continental and island ecosystems throughout the world. Invasive ants often become highly abundant in their introduced range and can outnumber native ants. These numerical disparities underlie the competitive asymmetry between invasive ants and native ants and result from a complex interplay of behavioral, ecological, and genetic facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
1,463
7
33

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,201 publications
(1,602 citation statements)
references
References 331 publications
(325 reference statements)
31
1,463
7
33
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottlenecks can only be detected across a few dozen generations (Luikart et al 1998). Yet there is a lingering effect in the form of reduced genetic diversity (Holway et al 2002;Tsutsui et al 2000) unless repeated introductions from multiple, genetically distinct source populations counteract the effect of genetic bottlenecks connected to each single introduction. However, genetically diverse introduced populations, such as populations of the paper wasp in the USA (Johnson and Starks 2004), are the exception.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bottlenecks can only be detected across a few dozen generations (Luikart et al 1998). Yet there is a lingering effect in the form of reduced genetic diversity (Holway et al 2002;Tsutsui et al 2000) unless repeated introductions from multiple, genetically distinct source populations counteract the effect of genetic bottlenecks connected to each single introduction. However, genetically diverse introduced populations, such as populations of the paper wasp in the USA (Johnson and Starks 2004), are the exception.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In invasive Hymenoptera, low genetic diversity is believed to be the reason for low intraspecific aggression, which in extreme cases leads to unicoloniality, i.e., the formation of large supercolonies that dominate the introduced range (Holway et al 2002;Tsutsui et al 2000Breton et al 2004;Suarez et al 2008;Fournier et al 2009). In addition, frequent occurrence of polygyny and colony propagation by budding could facilitate spread of invasive species after introduction .…”
Section: Colony Breeding Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tramp ants are species that are intimately associated with human activities, and generally nest in structures built in urban environments (Schultz and McGlynn, 2000). They share characteristics that facilitate their introduction into new environments, such as generalist feeding habits, polygamy, reduced intra-specific aggression, small size, and high recruitment, as well as having a high rate of migration, uni-colonial population, abolition of nuptial flight, and very small workers and queens (Passera, 1994;Holway et al, 2002).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are extensive cooperative units with many queens and very many workers integrated harmoniously over several square metres to many square kilometres (Crozier & Pamilo 1996; Giraud et al 2002; Steiner et al 2009). Supercoloniality is often considered key to the success of invasive ant species (Holway et al 2002), and supercolonies have been thoroughly studied over the last decades (Tsutsui et al 2000; Giraud et al 2002; Pedersen et al 2006; Leniaud et al 2011; Huszar et al 2014; Kennedy et al 2014). However, the factors triggering their emergence remain largely unknown (Suarez & Suhr 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%