“…When the coefficients a j (t, x) are complex valued for some 1 ≤ j ≤ p−1, then we know from [8,20] that some decay conditions for |x| → ∞ must be required on the imaginary part of the coefficients in order to obtain H ∞ well posedness. In the papers [20,21], Ichinose has given necessary and sufficient conditions for the case p = 2, x ∈ R. Kajitani and Baba [22] then proved that, for p = 2 and a 2 (t) constant, x ∈ R n , the Cauchy problem (1.1) is H ∞ well posed if Im a 1 (t, x) = O(|x| −σ ), σ ≥ 1, as |x| → ∞, (1.3) uniformly with respect to t ∈ [0, T ]. Second-order equations with p = 2 and decay conditions as |x| → ∞ have been considered, for example, in [12,16].…”