1994
DOI: 10.1080/10556799408232061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The catalogue of structural and dynamical characteristics of 103 open star clusters and the firstresults of its investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in segregated clusters, due to energy equipartition the brightest stars are more concentrated to the cluster centre, and do not reproduce the correct tidal radius. Nevertheless, for distant clusters we can see a distance-dependent effect only in the upper panel of Fig.6, where we compare our masses with those of Danilov and Seleznev (1994). Since the M D /M C -relations decrease with distance modulus, we suppose that our method manages biases better than the approach by Danilov and Seleznev (1994).…”
Section: Various Scales Of Cluster Massesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Especially in segregated clusters, due to energy equipartition the brightest stars are more concentrated to the cluster centre, and do not reproduce the correct tidal radius. Nevertheless, for distant clusters we can see a distance-dependent effect only in the upper panel of Fig.6, where we compare our masses with those of Danilov and Seleznev (1994). Since the M D /M C -relations decrease with distance modulus, we suppose that our method manages biases better than the approach by Danilov and Seleznev (1994).…”
Section: Various Scales Of Cluster Massesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In Fig.6 we compare the different results on mass estimates. Danilov & Seleznev (1994) derived masses for 103 compact, distant (>1 kpc) clusters from star counts down to B = 16 from homogeneous wide-field observations with the 50-cm Schmidt camera of the Ural university. For each cluster, the authors estimated the average mass of a star observed in a cluster and then computed the total visible cluster mass.…”
Section: Various Scales Of Cluster Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed study of stellar velocities in OCls from the list [52] may provide further data (in addition to those already obtained by Danilov and Putkov [49], which are available at http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/ /Vizier?-source=J/AZh/89/674) on the non-stationarity of these clusters and the instability of PSD fluctuations marked by the " * " subscript in Table 2. Such a study may use the radial variations of the stellar velocity dispersion in the cluster and the dispersions of tangential and radial velocities of the stars in the extended neighborhoods of these clusters (the increase of stellar velocity dispersion with clustercentric distance is an important kinematic indicator of OCl nonstationarity [34]).…”
Section: ) νmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Given that the maximum radii of open clusters do not exceed 10-15 pc [22], it is safe to suggest that the eclipsing system SZ Cam is not a member of the NGC 1502 open cluster onto whose center it projects.…”
Section: Estimates Of the Mass Of The Third Body And The Distance To mentioning
confidence: 99%