2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470513446.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cat Infected with Brugia Pahangi as a Model of Human Filariasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility that could explain the low counts of male worms is that the males in the patients providing the specimens were anatomically separate from the females. This has been observed in some experimental brugian models and may explain why at least half of infected experimental animals do not become microfilaraemic (Denham and Fletcher, 1987). All six children in the present study whose lymphnode specimens contained only living male W. bancrofti were amicrofilaraemic (unpubl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Another possibility that could explain the low counts of male worms is that the males in the patients providing the specimens were anatomically separate from the females. This has been observed in some experimental brugian models and may explain why at least half of infected experimental animals do not become microfilaraemic (Denham and Fletcher, 1987). All six children in the present study whose lymphnode specimens contained only living male W. bancrofti were amicrofilaraemic (unpubl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This has made it extremely difficult to obtain material from these organisms. In contrast, B. malayi can be successfully cultured in a variety of surrogate animal hosts (Denham and Fletcher, 1987; Mak et al, 1990; Nelson et al, 1991; Weil et al, 1992). Accordingly, B. malayi has become the model organism of choice for the study of the filarial parasites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there remains a crucial immunological challenge in the use of genetic manipulations, which has prevented the use of these animals to clearly define the functionality of protective immunity in experimental filariasis. Elsewhere, the effects of antibodies produced against the third stage larvae (L3) as well as antigens associated larval moulting , antibodies to microfilariae sheath , effector cells such as eosinophils and basophils , cytokines such IL‐5, IL‐4, TNF‐ α and nitric oxide appear to impair larval development and facilitate microfilariae clearance have been documented. These studies among others demonstrate that cytokines, antibodies and specific population of immune cells are used extensively to understand the protective immunity in filariasis nonetheless, a clear consensus remains to be established.…”
Section: Protective Immunity: Insight From Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%