“…Therefore, caste power haunts both the designation of the public as the site of "modern" governance and the private as a realm of timeless "tradition." This binary, as postcolonial, feminist, and anti-caste scholars have traced, irrevocably transformed how caste society reflected on its practices-the insistence on "family firms" among mercantile castes (Birla, 2009), the gendered caste practice of widow immolation (Mani, 1998), imaginations of bondage and enslavement (Mohan, 2015;Prakash, 1990;Viswanath, 2014), caste enumeration (Dirks, 2001), and occupational stigma and privilege (Pandian, 2009;Prashad, 2000;Rawat, 2011;Subramanian, 2019). In each case, colonial liberalism, in anxious collusion with caste hegemony, arbitrarily reformed some aspects of caste practice while labeling others as private expressions of cultural tradition (Rao, 2009;Viswanath, 2014).…”