The case of national health promotion policy in Australia: where to now?

Abstract

Issue addressed Over the last three decades there has been an incremental investment in health promotion and prevention across Australia; yet, the Commonwealth Government and some state/territory governments have more recently instigated funding cuts in health promotion and prevention. This paper argues that the role of health promotion is critical in contemporary Australia and discusses strategies needed to move forward within the context of recent disinvestments. Discussion Key areas of concern relating to recent health promotion and prevention disinvestment in Australia include the abolishment of the Australian National Preventive Health Agency, the cessation of the National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health and significant cuts to Indigenous programs. These changes pose a significant threat to the health, economic and social well being of Australians and the region, particularly those that are most vulnerable. Conclusions Future health promotion and prevention efforts will require strategic leadership and action to enhance the promotion of health equity in Australia over the coming decades. We call on governments to (re)invest in health promotion and prevention both in and outside the health sector so that health promotion professionals can continue their advocacy efforts aimed at articulating their professional place in improving population health. So what? Recent changes to national health promotion and prevention policy are detrimental to the health and well being of the Australian population, particularly those most vulnerable. Sound planning to revitalise and refocus health promotion action in Australia is urgently required.

Surviving neoliberalism, maintaining values: Community health mergers in Victoria, Australia

“…Victoria and Australia's PHC sector remains fluid and volatile, with ongoing significant changes expected to further entrench neoliberalism and therefore continue to challenge Victorian CHS' ability to undertake activities central to a comprehensive PHC approach, such as community participation and intersectoral collaboration . Examples include the continued transformation of block funding models to person‐controlled care packages (notably in the aged care and disability sectors) and reduced funding being allocated to primary prevention activities . Internationally, many comprehensive PHC organisations are also struggling to remain viable and to reconcile their socially oriented vocation with the challenges of neoliberal economic thinking .…”

Ten years on from the World Health Organization Commission of Social Determinants of Health: Progress or procrastination?

“…In particular, AHPA was a founding partner of the Social Determinants of Health Alliance (SDOHA) which was established in 2012. AHPA has also made multiple submissions to various government inquiries and consultation processes, often advocating for a stronger focus on SDH, particularly during periods of disinvestment in health promotion . This has included responses to Senate Community Affairs References Committee Inquiry mentioned above, a response to the abolition of the Australian National Preventive Health Agency, and multiple federal budget responses advocating for a great focus on health equity.…”

Effective strategies to prevent obesity

“…No country in the world has yet managed to turn around its rates of overweight and obesity, and despite a suite of strategies identified internationally as potentially being effective, implementation of these remains patchy in Australia . Many recommendations and proposals have been suggested by Australian governments to address overweight and obesity, but little progress has been made because these have not being implemented in a comprehensive or sustained way to be effective . This could be rectified with the implementation and funding of a long‐term strategy for healthy weight.…”