2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case of K.C.: contributions of a memory-impaired person to memory theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
202
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
12
202
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a growing body of data supports the context processing account of hippocampal function, impairment of episodic memory is a well-documented consequence of hippocampal damage in humans (Vargha-Khadem et al, 1997;Tulving and Markowitsch, 1998;Rosenbaum et al, 2005), and the effects of lesions in animals are consistent with this idea (Agster et al, 2002;Ergorul and Eichenbaum, 2004). One possible explanation is that these episodic memory impairments are secondary to context processing deficits.…”
Section: Could Episodic Memory Impairments Results From Context Procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a growing body of data supports the context processing account of hippocampal function, impairment of episodic memory is a well-documented consequence of hippocampal damage in humans (Vargha-Khadem et al, 1997;Tulving and Markowitsch, 1998;Rosenbaum et al, 2005), and the effects of lesions in animals are consistent with this idea (Agster et al, 2002;Ergorul and Eichenbaum, 2004). One possible explanation is that these episodic memory impairments are secondary to context processing deficits.…”
Section: Could Episodic Memory Impairments Results From Context Procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient K.C. has significant damage in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortices (Rosenbaum et al, 2005), patient V.C. has evidence of hypometabolism in the right thalamus and in right parietal cortex , patient R.S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, EFs largely rely on the integrity of prefrontal and other frontal regions, and to some extent of parietal cortex (Friedman & Miyake, 2017; Gläscher et al, 2009). Earlier seminal works conducted on patients with focal brain lesions showed that EM and EFs, although functionally related, are in part behaviorally dissociable, that is, patients with selective MTL damage display EFs within normal psychometric ranges (Augustinack et al, 2014; Buckner, 2004; McKenna & Gerhand, 2002; Rosenbaum et al, 2005), while patients suffering from prefrontal insult demonstrate relatively preserved aspects of EM, especially in recognition memory (Milner, Corsi, & Leonard, 1991; Shimamura, Janowsky, & Squire, 1990; Wheeler & Stuss, 2003). Recent functional neuroimaging investigations have confirmed previous lesion studies and additionally revealed the existence of a distributed network subserving both EM and EFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%