The case for the five in final five voting

Gehl, Katherine

doi:10.1007/s10602-022-09386-6

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The election began with all 20 eligible sisters, each having a vote in the process. Similar to the recent suggestion by Gehl [25], they employed a form of plurality voting to narrow down the group to seven sisters. Recognizing the limitations of plurality voting, these seven individuals were then required to use plurality voting once again to select an additional two sisters to join their group.…”

Section: Ramon Llullmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

General flaws of currently discussed election systems and a solution based on a new view on abstention from voting

Kemm

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most voting systems suffer from a common weakness: they approach voting as a problem of choice or ranking. However, voting is merely the final step in an election procedure, following one or more selection stages. Furthermore, an election is not an isolated event but is repeated every few years. In this paper, we propose a new perspective on elections that takes into account the entire process, starting from the initial set of individuals with passive electoral rights, and the aspect of reelection. By adopting a fresh perspective on abstentions and introducing an adapted form of Majority Judgment, which can also be understood as an expanded form of Approval Voting, we are able to design a comprehensive election process that can be easily legislated. This process establishes appropriate incentives for politicians seeking reelection, as well as for parties nominating candidates.

show abstract

Section: Ramon Llullmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…In parallel with Llull's method, Katherine Gehl [25] suggests a two-stage procedure. The first round aims to narrow down the ballot to five names, and General flaws of currently discussed election systems .…”

Section: Appropriate Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

General flaws of currently discussed election systems and a solution based on a new view on abstention from voting

Kemm

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The case for the five in final five voting

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

General flaws of currently discussed election systems and a solution based on a new view on abstention from voting

General flaws of currently discussed election systems and a solution based on a new view on abstention from voting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About