1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)08212-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for “presumed consent” in organ donation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1984, less than 7% of Americans supported the notion of presumed consent (44,48). Because of poor donation rates this approach has been promoted again recently, provoking strong ethical debate (49,50). Although a majority of individuals preferred an explicit consensus model in the decision of organ donation, a majority had not adequately fixed their will.…”
Section: The Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1984, less than 7% of Americans supported the notion of presumed consent (44,48). Because of poor donation rates this approach has been promoted again recently, provoking strong ethical debate (49,50). Although a majority of individuals preferred an explicit consensus model in the decision of organ donation, a majority had not adequately fixed their will.…”
Section: The Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information is treated differently across countries and the collection of statistics can introduce bias. For example, the cause of death and cultural differences can have an impact on donor statistics [7]. Furthermore, one must consider global trends while comparing donor rate increases.…”
Section: Arguments For An 'Opt-out' Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could potentially result in a higher rate of refusal. Kennedy et al suggest that during the discussion of organ donations, the 'opt-out' system allows families to be partially relieved of the burden of deciding [7]. The families have transitioned into a position of corroborating facts instead of pushed into making a timely decision [7].…”
Section: Arguments For An 'Opt-out' Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, opponents of presumed consent have pointed out that this system is neither morally nor ethically acceptable. In fact, the huge majority of 4 Gundle (2004), Gnant et al (1991), Michielsen et al (1996), Matesanz and Miranda (2001), Kaur (1998) and Kennedy et al (1998). 5 Following Gill (2004): "no matter how well the current system (informed consent) is instituted, there will still be cases in which people who would have preferred to donate their organs will be buried with all their organs intact; call these mistaken non-removals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%