The Case for Mandatory MOPS

Abstract

Objective: To provide background information and a rationale regarding the mandatory Maintenance of Professional Standards (MOPS) Program of the RANZCP. Conclusions: MOPS has evolved over ten years and will continue to develop and change. MOPS programs have been viewed by Medical Colleges as a major force in unifying the profession against destructive outside influences. MOPS is not an assessment of competence or performance, and not equivalent to “recertification”. Rather, MOPS reflects the belief that participation in continuing medical education and quality improvement processes will maintain and improve standards of practice. There is every reason to be confident that, with ongoing adjustment, MOPS will continue to meet the professional development needs of all RANZCP Fellows.

Correspondence

“…Dr Mayne’s article supporting mandatory MOPS 1 does not address any of the substantive issues raised in my earlier article 2 …”

Mandatory MOPS

“…Dr Mayne's article supporting mandatory MOPS[1] does not address any of the substantive issues raised in my earlier article. [2] The issues of MOPS being costly, unproven and educationally counterproductive were ignored.…”