2009
DOI: 10.5038/1936-4660.2.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for Infusing Quantitative Literacy into Introductory Geoscience Courses

Abstract: We present the case for introductory geoscience courses as model venues for increasing the quantitative literacy (QL) of large numbers of the college-educated population. The geosciences provide meaningful context for a number of fundamental mathematical concepts that are revisited several times in a single course. Using some best practices from the mathematics education community surrounding problem solving, calculus reform, pre-college mathematics and five geoscience/math workshops, geoscience and mathematic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of students in this course were able to execute the code on VHub.org, simulate volcanic eruptions, and interpret results of the simulation. Although not quantitatively assessed, this experience upholds the idea that introductory geology courses are an ideal venue for quantitative concepts (e.g.. Wenner et al 2009;Campbell et al 2011).…”
Section: Learning About Numerical Models With Tephra2mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The majority of students in this course were able to execute the code on VHub.org, simulate volcanic eruptions, and interpret results of the simulation. Although not quantitatively assessed, this experience upholds the idea that introductory geology courses are an ideal venue for quantitative concepts (e.g.. Wenner et al 2009;Campbell et al 2011).…”
Section: Learning About Numerical Models With Tephra2mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This thinking was amidst a backdrop in which many in the geoscience education community, particularly the NAGT, were working to create an environment through faculty development workshops and educational resources development to enhance quantitative skills of geoscience majors (see Hancock and Manduca 2005;Wenner et al 2009). At the same time, there were many in the geoscience education community making a parallel argument: geoscience educators must stop avoiding elementary mathematics (such as relationships expressed in simple equations) in introductory, service-level geology courses (Goforth and Dunbar 2000;Wagner 2000;Vacher 2001), no matter how much the students complained on students evaluations about "doing math."…”
Section: Rationale For Ssacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 49 courses are distributed across the curriculum (Table 3B), as was the intent of the project. Many (15) of the nonmathematics courses are geology courses, reflecting the geoscience-education heritage of SERC and its continuing workshops and other activities in that arena (e.g., Wenner et al 2009). …”
Section: Boarding Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have described QL efforts across the curriculum, beyond formal mathematics courses (Hughes-Hallett 2001;Steele and Kiliç-Bahi 2008;Sweet et al 2008;Wenner et al 2009;Bressoud 2009). Furthermore, numerous authors have advocated using technology, such as spreadsheets, to develop students' math skills (Jacobson and Kozma 2000;Jiang and McClintock 2000;Ozgun-Koca 2001;Baker and Sugden 2003;Alagic 2003;Abramovich et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%