2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for increased validation of rainfall simulation as a tool for researching runoff, soil erosion, and related processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although rainfall simulation experiments are not exactly representative of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation, they are one of the most common methods to measure interception (Iserloh et al, 2013) and allow estimation of the amount of rainwater intercepted by plant individuals where field methods are extraordinarily challenging (like beneath shrub canopies). The extreme rates typically produced by rainfall simulators have been (rightly) criticized for not representing realistic rain event properties under typical conditions (Dunkerley, 2008, 2021); however, this study demonstrates how these simulations may be useful in assessing the response of vegetation (and localized soils) to the extreme rainfall conditions projected for some regions under climate change (and increasingly observed in Mediterranean Spain) (Camarasa‐Belmonte et al, 2020; Duchon et al, 2014; Duchon & Biddle, 2010; Llasat et al, 2021; Pollock et al, 2018). Additionally, these experiments can help to identify associations between the canopy interception capacity, the size, and the species of the shrubs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although rainfall simulation experiments are not exactly representative of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation, they are one of the most common methods to measure interception (Iserloh et al, 2013) and allow estimation of the amount of rainwater intercepted by plant individuals where field methods are extraordinarily challenging (like beneath shrub canopies). The extreme rates typically produced by rainfall simulators have been (rightly) criticized for not representing realistic rain event properties under typical conditions (Dunkerley, 2008, 2021); however, this study demonstrates how these simulations may be useful in assessing the response of vegetation (and localized soils) to the extreme rainfall conditions projected for some regions under climate change (and increasingly observed in Mediterranean Spain) (Camarasa‐Belmonte et al, 2020; Duchon et al, 2014; Duchon & Biddle, 2010; Llasat et al, 2021; Pollock et al, 2018). Additionally, these experiments can help to identify associations between the canopy interception capacity, the size, and the species of the shrubs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was a pressurized system including a spray nozzle attached to a PVC pipe that was connected to a water tap. Dunkerley [46] had undertaken a comprehensive…”
Section: Rainfall Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pressurized nozzle-based rainfall simulation system was employed to generate an artificial rainfall. Acknowledging the distinctions between artificial and natural rainfall events [46], this study attempted to replicate the characteristics of a natural rainfall as closely as possible. Further details about the rainfall simulation system are provided in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, this phenomenon impacts soil erodibility and infiltration capacity [37][38][39]. The interaction of freezing and thawing with water erosion, gravity erosion, and other factors either concurrently or alternatively leads to a soil erosion process distinct from that driven by singular forces, consequently exacerbating soil erosion rates [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The influence of freezing and thawing extends to soil erodibility and critical shear, potentially leading to modifications in soil erosion rates [49,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%