1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91467-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for Heat-Treated Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In preliminary wet heat-treatm ent studies of the M ethod II product (60 °C for 10 h in the presence of high concentrations of glycine and sucrose) only 65 ± 8% recovery of V III :C was observed in comparison (experim ents not presented). Though the impact of dry heat-treatm ent on neoantigen exposure was not assessed in the present study, other reports have indicated th at there is no evidence this occurs w hether determ ined by in vitro analyses (8,(31)(32)(33) or after clinical evaluation in animals o r hemophilia A patients (8,32,(34)(35)(36). The inactivation of lipidcoated viruses in plasma products by detergent treatm ent has been previously shown to be an effective m ethod of viral inactivation while perm itting good recovery of activity (37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In preliminary wet heat-treatm ent studies of the M ethod II product (60 °C for 10 h in the presence of high concentrations of glycine and sucrose) only 65 ± 8% recovery of V III :C was observed in comparison (experim ents not presented). Though the impact of dry heat-treatm ent on neoantigen exposure was not assessed in the present study, other reports have indicated th at there is no evidence this occurs w hether determ ined by in vitro analyses (8,(31)(32)(33) or after clinical evaluation in animals o r hemophilia A patients (8,32,(34)(35)(36). The inactivation of lipidcoated viruses in plasma products by detergent treatm ent has been previously shown to be an effective m ethod of viral inactivation while perm itting good recovery of activity (37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The considerable, but uncoordinated, efforts of the group supported by the Ministry of Industry and Research (MIR) [1–8], the groups based at the Cochin Hospital [9] and at the Pasteur Institute [10–18] slowly gathered the necessary information regarding numerous questions at issue: what was the cause of the decrease of CD4 T cells observed in asymptomatic patients [9,12]? Was it related to the purity of therapeutic products or to a hypothetical virus [6,7]? Were these disturbances related to therapeutic products imported from the USA (where AIDS had first been recognized) or was it also related to products derived from the French plasma [7]?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What was the evidence that the first viral inactivation methods (proven inefficient on hepatitis B virus and the putative agent of non‐A‐non‐B hepatitis) were active on LAV [17]? Was the fear of inhibitors to factor (F)VIII related to heat‐treatment‐induced neoantigens real [6]? What was the clinical value of the prototype assays to detect antibodies to LAV/HTLV‐III [14,16,18]?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%