The Case for Healthy U.S.‐China Agricultural Trade Relations despite Deglobalization Pressures

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is crippling the global economy and heightening distrust and political disagreements among major countries. Furthermore, ongoing deglobalization efforts taken by firms and countries are fueling the rise of economic nationalism. A prime example is the possible decoupling of U.S.-China economic and trade relations, which the ongoing trade war has already significantly disrupted. This paper analyzes the impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. agricultural exports to China, especially the added delays and uncertainty on China's food imports meeting the U.S.-China phase one trade deal target. I present the views of U.S. farmers and the general public toward China and argue that healthy U.S.-China agricultural trade relations are not only critical for both countries but welcomed by U.S. farmers. I also discuss the possible rise in non-tariff barriers following the pandemic as well as trade policies that are increasingly intertwined with political tensions. Finally, I discuss how the U.S.-China phase one trade deal could possibly lead to a more balanced bilateral agricultural trade portfolio with greater share of protein and retail food products.

Deliver Smart, Not More! Building Economically Sustainable Competitiveness on the Ground of High Agri-Food Trade Specialization in the EU

“…Not only does the Russian-Ukrainian conflict imply an increase in geopolitical tensions and socio-economic struggles [32,33], but it also involves a reconfiguration of economic competitiveness [34]. Achieving and maintaining a sustainable competitive advantage in terms of agri-food products trading has been difficult even before the Russian-Ukrainian conflict or the COVID-19 pandemic, due to many influencing factors, as identified in the literature: the conflicting sustainability-related goal of achieving global food security simultaneously with aiming for economic development obtained through high product specialization and levels of competitiveness [35,36], finding pathways for mitigating the impact of agricultural activities on climate change [37,38], managing trade wars [39,40], and other relevant factors.…”

The Influence of Sino-US Trade Friction on U.S. Soybean Export

“…The political implications of domestic responses to a series of trade frictions are complex, and it is not unusual for some interests to be sacrificed. That set the stage for an election the following year [13].…”

Tariffs, agricultural subsidies, and the 2020 US presidential election

“…The Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP) is another ad hoc farm subsidy to assist the US agricultural producers impacted by both domestic and international market disruptions due to the COVID-19 outbreak. 52 Recent studies on this topic have suggested that the CFAP payments can be considered broadly to be trade aid payments (Glauber 2021;Janzen et al 2021;Orden 2020;Rawlings 2021;Zhang 2021). We thus consider CFAP payments to be a component of US agricultural policy, add CFAP payments to the Net MFP, and re-estimate equation ( 6).…”