2011
DOI: 10.1598/rt.64.6.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for Authentic Tasks in Content Literacy

Abstract: Motivation, academic vocabulary, and the role of teachers have been themes of previous Content Literacy columns. In this installment, we suggest that the tasks, or assignments, students complete are an important aspect of content literacy because they influence students' understandings of content and reading. Additionally, we demonstrate how well‐designed tasks are closely associated with increasing student engagement and expanding word knowledge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the most fundamental level, it demonstrated my realization that it is critical to support both cognitive and motivational needs during PBL. Researchers have long perceived that addressing authentic problems is inherently motivating (Parsons & Ward, 2011;Willems & Gonzalez-DeHass, 2012). But evidence indicates that for students to be motivated, support is needed.…”
Section: Allowing Research Assistants To Identify Research Topics Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the most fundamental level, it demonstrated my realization that it is critical to support both cognitive and motivational needs during PBL. Researchers have long perceived that addressing authentic problems is inherently motivating (Parsons & Ward, 2011;Willems & Gonzalez-DeHass, 2012). But evidence indicates that for students to be motivated, support is needed.…”
Section: Allowing Research Assistants To Identify Research Topics Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of disciplinary literacy have suggested that specific content areas necessitate particular strategies (Fang, ; Gillis, ; Hynd‐Shanahan, ; Shanahan & Shanahan, ). Researchers have insisted that students must read and write in the specific discipline to show proficiency (Biancarosa & Snow, ; Fang, ; Misulis, ; Parsons & Ward, ), and have called for a close relationship between content area teachers and disciplinary experts.…”
Section: Situating Our Study Within the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…School writing can be understood as writing that is primarily focused on mechanics (e.g., orthography, punctuation, neatness), monomodal (pen(cil) to paper) text production, accuracy, conformity, and adherence to prescribed topics, and expected to be done alone. This kind of writing is devoid of interactive engagement with others and is intended rather for non-dialogic purposes such as grading and fulfilling curriculum expectations (Collier, 2010;Duke et al, 2006;Gambrell, Hughes, Calvert, Malloy, & Igo, 2011;Moffett, 1979;Nixon &Topping, 2001;Parsons & Ward, 2011). Britton (1970) argued that the attempt to teach writing skills without embedding those skills in the social, communicative, processes that are at the heart of writing is a hollow pedagogy: …what children use language for in school must be 'operations' and not 'dummy runs'.…”
Section: During These Two or Three Weeks Rose Was Away From School Smentioning
confidence: 99%