2002
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case against ‘the evidence’: A different perspective on evidence-based medicine

Abstract: It is agreed that a degree of professional consensus is necessary. However, too great an emphasis on evidence-based medicine oversimplifies the complex and interpersonal nature of clinical care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
96
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Il ne faut pas y attendre les recettes miracles qu'il s'agirait simplement d'appliquer sans se questionner. Comme disent si bien Williams et Garner (2002) « Let us hope that the day will not come when, on seeing a patient, the doctor's first thought is to turn to the Cochrane Library ». La nature humaine est trop complexe pour se laisser saisir par le seul positivisme.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Il ne faut pas y attendre les recettes miracles qu'il s'agirait simplement d'appliquer sans se questionner. Comme disent si bien Williams et Garner (2002) « Let us hope that the day will not come when, on seeing a patient, the doctor's first thought is to turn to the Cochrane Library ». La nature humaine est trop complexe pour se laisser saisir par le seul positivisme.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Many EBM critics point to the "experiential nature" of medical practice for being not only inextricable from but also inappropriately maligned by the evidence based approach (Tanenbaum 1993;Williams & Garner, 2002). However, supporters of EBM insist that experiential knowledge is worth minimizing because experience allows for the repetition of mistakes.…”
Section: Randomized Controlled Trials: the "Gold Standard" Of Medicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salkovskis argues that this is best conceptualised as "Empirically Grounded Clinical Interventions" which are supported by a range of evidence. Williams and Garner (2002) argue for consideration of evidence available from other sources such as naturalistic enquiry and case material that helps to understand individual clients.…”
Section: Bridging the Research Practice Dividementioning
confidence: 99%