1991
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.1991.6.4s.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Clinical Performance to 15 Years

Abstract: The Carpentier‐Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis was implanted in 1,195 patients in 1,213 operative procedures between 1975 and 1987, with the majority of implants performed prior to 1982 at the University of British Columbia. The mean age of the patient population was 57.2 years (range 8 to 85 years). The mean follow‐up was 7.4 years per patient. The freedom from the combination of thromboemboiism and antithromboembolic therapy‐related hemorrhage at 15 years was 79.5% for aortic valve replacement (AVR), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1995, Jamieson confirmed previous durability reports by demonstrating that 86% of Carpentier-Edwards valves used for aortic replacement and 70% of those used for mitral replacement were free of structural deterioration at 10 years. However, these values decreased to 58% and 21% at 15 years, and to 39% and 14% at 17 years for the aortic and mitral prostheses, respectively (11)(12)(13). These freedom values are similar to the 18-year freedom from structural valve deterioration (at a younger mean age) reported for the Hancock prosthesis by Bortolotti and associates (14).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In 1995, Jamieson confirmed previous durability reports by demonstrating that 86% of Carpentier-Edwards valves used for aortic replacement and 70% of those used for mitral replacement were free of structural deterioration at 10 years. However, these values decreased to 58% and 21% at 15 years, and to 39% and 14% at 17 years for the aortic and mitral prostheses, respectively (11)(12)(13). These freedom values are similar to the 18-year freedom from structural valve deterioration (at a younger mean age) reported for the Hancock prosthesis by Bortolotti and associates (14).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The mitral position of bioprosthesis favors the earlier primary degeneration of leaflets, probably because of a greater closing stress, which takes place in mitral position during the systole 27,[38][39][40] . In mitral position, the opening time of leaflets is up to three times the opening time of aortic bioprosthesis leaflets 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial results were extremely gratifying reporting a low incidence of reoperations for SVD and thromboembolic complications at a mediumterm follow-up further supporting the initial enthusiasm 20 . Subsequently, other companies started to manufacture different models of porcine bioprostheses; some of them were abandoned quite early while others demonstrated good reliability and were implanted until the more recent years 21,22 . Some early problems encountered with porcine bioprostheses were related to the excessive height of the stent which caused fatal left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and left ventricular rupture when used for MVR 23,24 .…”
Section: Stented Porcine Bioprosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%