1980
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex in conscious rabbits.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. A method is described for altering the pressure across the wall of the carotid sinus in conscious rabbits by enclosing the carotid bifurcation in a rigid, fluid-filled capsule. The extracapsular arterial baroreceptors were denervated.2. The baroreceptor-heart rate reflex, elicited by injecting vasoactive drugs or inflating aortic and vena caval cuffs, was used to test the new method. The function of the carotid sinus was shown to be unaffected by enclosure in the capsule. Denervation of the extracaps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is evidence that in the rabbit the carotid chemoreceptors do not act tonically on the circulation (Chalmers et al, 1967a) and are not excited until the arterial pressure falls below 20 mm Hg (Ott et al, 1971;Faris et al, 1980), so that it is unlikely that effects attributed to baroreceptor input were confounded by the carotid chemoreceptor reflex. Intrapericardial procaine blocks afferents from the heart and not, for instance, those from the lungs (Arndt et al, 1981), but it also blocks the cardiac efferent nerves, so that it must be assumed that the calculated reflex effects on vascular resistance were unaffected by the abolition of changes in heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is evidence that in the rabbit the carotid chemoreceptors do not act tonically on the circulation (Chalmers et al, 1967a) and are not excited until the arterial pressure falls below 20 mm Hg (Ott et al, 1971;Faris et al, 1980), so that it is unlikely that effects attributed to baroreceptor input were confounded by the carotid chemoreceptor reflex. Intrapericardial procaine blocks afferents from the heart and not, for instance, those from the lungs (Arndt et al, 1981), but it also blocks the cardiac efferent nerves, so that it must be assumed that the calculated reflex effects on vascular resistance were unaffected by the abolition of changes in heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intrapericardial procaine blocks afferents from the heart and not, for instance, those from the lungs (Arndt et al, 1981), but it also blocks the cardiac efferent nerves, so that it must be assumed that the calculated reflex effects on vascular resistance were unaffected by the abolition of changes in heart rate. This is a fair assumption in the case of the arterial baroreceptor reflex, since we have shown that-in conscious rabbits-the carotid sinus reflex controls arterial pressure by changing vascular resistance rather than cardiac output (Faris et al, 1981b), and that this control is unaffected by drugs that abolish changes in heart rate (Faris et al, 1980). The cardiac receptor reflex effects were examined after barodenervation, which of itself had abolished changes of heart rate as blood volume was altered (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this the maximum gain (G) of the reflex, and the upper and lower limiting values of HR (HRu, HR,) were estimated ( Fig. 2) (Faris et al, 1980b). The residual variance from the fitted curve was never more than 5% of the total variance.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six to 8 days before the second study both carotid sinuses were denervated and the aortic nerves divided, as described previously (Faris et al, 1980b).…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies with the neck chamber have revealed (a) poor correlations between HR and BP effects on BR activation and deactivation (Faris et al, 1980;Ludbrook et al, 1980), and (b) that BR effects on BP may be independent of those on HR, since they are not reduced when HR is kept constant by atrial pacing or autonomic blockade. However, little information on that function in man was available until the development of the neck chamber technique.…”
Section: Measurement Of Arterial Pressure Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%