2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.07329
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. Stellar atmospheric parameters of target stars with SteParSyn

Emilio Marfil,
Hugo M. Tabernero,
David Montes
et al.

Abstract: We determined effective temperatures, surface gravities, and metallicities for a sample of 343 M dwarfs observed with CARMENES, the double-channel, high-resolution spectrograph installed at the 3.5 m telescope at Calar Alto Observatory. We employed SteParSyn, a Bayesian spectral synthesis implementation particularly designed to infer the stellar atmospheric parameters of late-type stars following a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. We made use of the BT-Settl model atmospheres and the radiative transfer code … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(195 reference statements)
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained the photospheric parameters T eff , log g and [Fe/H] of TOI-1759 following Passegger et al (2019) by fitting PHOENIX synthetic spectra to the combined (co-added) CARMENES VIS spectrum described in Section 2.2.1, which has a signal-to-noise ratio in the VIS channel of ≈ 200. We used v sin i = 2 km s −1 , which was measured by Marfil et al (2021) as an upper limit. We derived its luminosity following Cifuentes et al (2020) by using the latest parallactic distance from Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2021), and by integrating Gaia, 2MASS (Skrutskie et al 2006) and AllWISE (Cutri et al 2014) photometry covering the full spectral energy distribution with the Virtual Observatory Spectral energy distribution Analyser (Bayo et al 2008).…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We obtained the photospheric parameters T eff , log g and [Fe/H] of TOI-1759 following Passegger et al (2019) by fitting PHOENIX synthetic spectra to the combined (co-added) CARMENES VIS spectrum described in Section 2.2.1, which has a signal-to-noise ratio in the VIS channel of ≈ 200. We used v sin i = 2 km s −1 , which was measured by Marfil et al (2021) as an upper limit. We derived its luminosity following Cifuentes et al (2020) by using the latest parallactic distance from Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2021), and by integrating Gaia, 2MASS (Skrutskie et al 2006) and AllWISE (Cutri et al 2014) photometry covering the full spectral energy distribution with the Virtual Observatory Spectral energy distribution Analyser (Bayo et al 2008).…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOI-1759's pseudo equivalent width of the Hα line as defined by Schöfer et al (2019) is pEW (Hα) < −0.3 Å (Marfil et al 2021), classifying it as an Hα inactive star. Furthermore, Marfil et al (2021) assign it to the Galactic thin disc population, which has a maximum age of about 8 Gyr (Fuhrmann 1998).…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others attempt to fit spectral energy distributions (SEDs) on low to mid-resolution spectra (Mann et al 2013). More recently, advances in spectral modelling and the advent of new high-resolution spectrographs in the near-infrared (NIR) domain allowed some authors to perform direct fits of synthetic spectra on high-resolution ★ E-mail: paul.cristofari@irap.omp.eu (IRAP) spectroscopic observations (Passegger et al 2018;Schweitzer et al 2019;Marfil et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus reasonable to suspect that the giant planets in our sample have formed in particularly metal-rich environments that are not represented by the metallicity distribution of the synthetic systems. The reported values for the giant planet hosts mentioned above are 0.05 ± 0.2 dex or −0.11 ± 0.10 for Gl 876 b (Correia et al 2010;Marfil et al 2021), 0.36 ± 0.2 for Gl 317 (Anglada-Escudé et al 2012), 0.13 ± 0.16 or −0.17 ± 0.10 for GJ 1148 (Passegger et al 2018;Marfil et al 2021) and −0.07 ± 0.16 or −0.12 ± 0.16 for GJ 3512 (Morales et al 2019;Marfil et al 2021), leaving only Gl 317 with an enhanced metallicity. Although the uncertainties are large, the other targets are consistent with solar metallicity.…”
Section: Excess Of Giant Planets Around Late M Dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 91%