2021
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.774.1535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The caridean shrimps of the genus Lysmata Risso, 1816 (Decapoda: Lysmatidae) from Madagascar collected during the Atimo-Vatae expedition: a new species and two new records

Abstract: The present study focuses on shrimps belonging to the genus Lysmata Risso, 1816, collected from Madagascar during the Atimo Vatae expedition carried out in 2010. Lysmata malagasy sp. nov. is a new species belonging to the clade named “long accessory ramous” or “cosmopolitan” in previous phylogenetic studies. The new species can be distinguished from the only two other representatives of this group in the Indo-west Pacific, L. ternatensis De Man, 1902, and L. trisetacea (Heller, 1861), by the accessory ramus of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 839 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DNA substitution model was the GTR + I + G. BI ( −lnL = 8681.40 for run 1; −lnL = 8679.75 for run 2) and ML ( −lnL = 7679.99) analyses provided congruent tree topologies (Figure 2), dividing Lysmata species worldwide, except L. olavoi , in three major groups (A, E, F). The clade A (posterior probability values, pp = 0.98; bootstrap values, bs = 96) accounts for the ‘unguiform accessory ramous/morpho-variable’ group (Baeza et al ., 2009 b ; Baeza, 2010; Fiedler et al ., 2010; Alves et al ., 2018; Ashrafi et al ., 2021). The clade B (pp = 0.86; bs = 82) consisted of a branch (C) in which the two sequences of L. olavoi cluster together (pp = 1; bs = 100) in a basal position with respect to the remaining Lysmata species, and by the clade D (pp = 1; bs = 98).…”
Section: Results and Taxonomic Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The DNA substitution model was the GTR + I + G. BI ( −lnL = 8681.40 for run 1; −lnL = 8679.75 for run 2) and ML ( −lnL = 7679.99) analyses provided congruent tree topologies (Figure 2), dividing Lysmata species worldwide, except L. olavoi , in three major groups (A, E, F). The clade A (posterior probability values, pp = 0.98; bootstrap values, bs = 96) accounts for the ‘unguiform accessory ramous/morpho-variable’ group (Baeza et al ., 2009 b ; Baeza, 2010; Fiedler et al ., 2010; Alves et al ., 2018; Ashrafi et al ., 2021). The clade B (pp = 0.86; bs = 82) consisted of a branch (C) in which the two sequences of L. olavoi cluster together (pp = 1; bs = 100) in a basal position with respect to the remaining Lysmata species, and by the clade D (pp = 1; bs = 98).…”
Section: Results and Taxonomic Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clade B (pp = 0.86; bs = 82) consisted of a branch (C) in which the two sequences of L. olavoi cluster together (pp = 1; bs = 100) in a basal position with respect to the remaining Lysmata species, and by the clade D (pp = 1; bs = 98). This latter clade is formed by the subclade E (pp = 1; bs = 85), that includes our and GenBank sequences of L. seticaudata in the ‘long accessory ramous/cosmopolitan’ group (Baeza et al ., 2009 b ; Baeza, 2010; Fiedler et al ., 2010; Alves et al ., 2018; Ashrafi et al ., 2021), and the subclade F (pp = 1; bs = 92), composed by species that previous phylogenies merge together in the ‘short accessory ramous’ group (Fiedler et al ., 2010; Ashrafi et al ., 2021) or split in two additional subclades (G: pp = 0.99; bs = 74; H: pp = 0.70; bs = 84), the ‘cleaner’ and ‘Tropical American/peppermint’ groups (Baeza et al ., 2009 b ; Baeza, 2010; Alves et al ., 2018).
Fig.
…”
Section: Results and Taxonomic Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lysmatidae Dana, 1852 is currently comprised of five genera ( Exhippolysmata Stebbing, 1915, Ligur Sarato, 1885, Lysmata Risso, 1816, Lysmatella Borradaile, 1915 and Mimocaris Nobili, 1903), of which Lysmata is the most speciose with 50 valid species (Prakash and Baeza, 2017; De Grave and Anker, 2018; Wang and Sha, 2018; Ashrafi et al ., 2021; Guéron et al ., 2022). These shrimps are widely distributed from tropical to temperate regions and exhibit a wide diversity of social systems (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%