2022
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12100979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cardiovascular Benefits and Infections Risk of SGLT2i versus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and metformin are both widely accepted anti-hyperglycemic agents. However, there is still no systematic review evaluating the cardiovascular benefits and risk of infections of SGLT2i versus metformin. To make that clear, we designed this study. Public databases, including the Cochrane library database, PubMed, and Embase were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) fitting the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted the data and appraised the study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In observational clinical studies, metformin had a similar effect on blood glucose as other diabetes medications in patients with diabetes and had minimal effect on blood glucose in individuals without diabetes, while showing antiarrhythmic effects in both groups. 40 , 41 Furthermore, there is clinical and experimental evidence that AF risk is not modified by blood glucose level. Post hoc analysis of the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) trial, which randomized patients with diabetes to an intensive vs standard glucose control strategy, found no difference in incident AF between the treatment groups.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence For Antiarrhythmic Effects Of Metforminmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In observational clinical studies, metformin had a similar effect on blood glucose as other diabetes medications in patients with diabetes and had minimal effect on blood glucose in individuals without diabetes, while showing antiarrhythmic effects in both groups. 40 , 41 Furthermore, there is clinical and experimental evidence that AF risk is not modified by blood glucose level. Post hoc analysis of the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) trial, which randomized patients with diabetes to an intensive vs standard glucose control strategy, found no difference in incident AF between the treatment groups.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence For Antiarrhythmic Effects Of Metforminmentioning
confidence: 99%