2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cardiac arrest survival score: A predictive algorithm for in-hospital mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies of OHCA survival so far, including ours, have focused on finding out what factors influence survival. However, few studies have recently been conducted to quantify the relative impacts of these factors to develop a predictive model of OHCA survival [ 41 , 42 ]. This predictive model can be used for stratifying each patient according to risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of OHCA survival so far, including ours, have focused on finding out what factors influence survival. However, few studies have recently been conducted to quantify the relative impacts of these factors to develop a predictive model of OHCA survival [ 41 , 42 ]. This predictive model can be used for stratifying each patient according to risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter response additionally, the delay in defibrillation was approximated by 6.5 min for the 'bCPR + AED' response (objective EVapp: response within 5-8 min). The results of other studies were included in the survival estimations in case the comparator of the study (survival after EMS response) was comparable to the baseline case for Belgium (10% survival for EMS arriving within 10 min) or in case odds ratios based on extensive meta-analysis or literature review had been calculated [8,10,42]. Different studies reported very high average survival rates for bystander defibrillation (of shockable rhythms) of 35-70% [9,[11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Outcomes and Measurement Of Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balan et al 74 created a similar simple scoring system to shockable rhythm‐witness‐age‐pH, the cardiac arrest survival score (CASS), to predict in‐hospital mortality, not neurologic outcome, after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. The score combined age (>75, 3 points), unwitnessed arrest (4 points), arrest at home (2.5 points), no bystander CPR (2.5 points), and non‐shockable initial rhythm (8 points) to produce a linear score associated with in‐hospital mortality with an area under the curve of 0.717 and 0.708 for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.…”
Section: Scoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%