2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The carbon flux of global rivers: A re-evaluation of amount and spatial patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we found that the 10 largest rivers export 28% of the global riverine DOC flux. These spatial patterns of riverine DOC exports agree with previous studies that used empirical models or meta‐analysis (Dai et al, ; Li et al, ; Ludwig et al, ). Certainly, there are also some rivers with small areas and discharges, such as the Nelson and Pechore that deliver more DOC than some large rivers, which might also be closely associated with the high soil carbon content of these basins (Hugelius et al, ; Li et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, we found that the 10 largest rivers export 28% of the global riverine DOC flux. These spatial patterns of riverine DOC exports agree with previous studies that used empirical models or meta‐analysis (Dai et al, ; Li et al, ; Ludwig et al, ). Certainly, there are also some rivers with small areas and discharges, such as the Nelson and Pechore that deliver more DOC than some large rivers, which might also be closely associated with the high soil carbon content of these basins (Hugelius et al, ; Li et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the small rivers, potential gaps in the production and consumption mechanisms are more diversified compared with large rivers, and these gaps also increase the difficulty of the model simulation. Although the contribution of small rivers in global DOC export could be relatively small, due to their less discharge compared to large rivers (Li et al, ), DOC simulation of small rivers would help to analyze the diversified mechanisms of DOC variation and should be essential for a complete global riverine DOC budget. Second, our model have some overestimations in large rivers (Figure ), which might be resulted from single DOC source (SOC) we considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, for particulate P, neither its concentration nor the particulate fraction were affected by permafrost distribution, probably due to the various processes of biological uptake and the mineral precipitation controlling the removal of P, both in the soil profile and in the river water. For example, lakes and bogs retained particulate P, similar to that of dissolved P, which is in agreement with global assessments (Bouwman et al, 2013), P behavior in European northern wetlands and lakes (Lidman et al, 2014), and recent results on dissolved P in the WSL rivers .…”
Section: A Maximum Of C and N In The Isolated And Sporadic Permafrostsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The carbon accumulated in inland water sediments has been estimated to range from 0.2 to 1.4 Pg C yr −1 (Battin et al, ; Cole et al, ; Dean & Gorham, ; Regnier et al, ; Stallard, ), and there is a sevenfold difference between the maximum and minimum estimates. Some estimates have suggested that global rivers export 0.4–0.6 Pg C of SOC every year (Dai et al, ; Galy et al, ; Holeman, ; Lal, ; Li et al, ; Ludwig et al, ; Mayorga et al, ; Schlesinger & Melack, ; Walling & Webb, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%