2013
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The carbon dioxide production rate assumption biases gastric emptying parameters in healthy adults

Abstract: The findings highlight the importance of directly measuring VCO(2)production rates throughout the (13)C OBT and could partly explain the conflicting evidence regarding the effect of obesity on GE rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanaka et al (2008) studied the detailed kinetics involved in GE of [ 13 C]octanoic acid once ingested in a test meal, which was important for the validation of the discrepancy in the results of the model by Ghoos et al (1993). Further research (Markey & Shafat, 2013) investigated different mechanisms to determine the CO 2 production rate (VCO 2 ) from the breath and the subsequent impact on GE results. They developed new parameters for the study with VCO 2DM the direct measurement of rate, VCO 2PR the predicted rate from resting and VCO 2BSA the predicted rate from body surface area.…”
Section: Expansion Of the Ghoos Et Al (1993) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sanaka et al (2008) studied the detailed kinetics involved in GE of [ 13 C]octanoic acid once ingested in a test meal, which was important for the validation of the discrepancy in the results of the model by Ghoos et al (1993). Further research (Markey & Shafat, 2013) investigated different mechanisms to determine the CO 2 production rate (VCO 2 ) from the breath and the subsequent impact on GE results. They developed new parameters for the study with VCO 2DM the direct measurement of rate, VCO 2PR the predicted rate from resting and VCO 2BSA the predicted rate from body surface area.…”
Section: Expansion Of the Ghoos Et Al (1993) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research (Markey & Shafat, 2013) investigated different mechanisms to determine the CO 2 production rate (VCO 2 ) from the breath and the subsequent impact on GE results. They developed new parameters for the study with VCO 2DM the direct measurement of rate, VCO 2PR the predicted rate from resting and VCO 2BSA the predicted rate from body surface area.…”
Section: [13c]‐oabt Data Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%