1952
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/22.6.543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Capillary-Tube Method of Rhesus Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1955
1955
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of blood groups in our series of 11,086 cases differed significantly from those of Pike and Dickins ('954), Richardson (1954), and Discombe and Meyer (1952), although the latter three series were compiled in an area within a few miles of this hospital (Table 1). If our series is compared with that of Discombe and Meyer the x2 for three degrees of freedom is 18.68.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The distribution of blood groups in our series of 11,086 cases differed significantly from those of Pike and Dickins ('954), Richardson (1954), and Discombe and Meyer (1952), although the latter three series were compiled in an area within a few miles of this hospital (Table 1). If our series is compared with that of Discombe and Meyer the x2 for three degrees of freedom is 18.68.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The results are closely similar in the two groups and they have, therefore, been combined to provide a single control series. Table II shows the distribution of the ABO blood groups in the combined series as compared with that reported by Discombe and Meyer (1952) for 10,000 women attending ante-natal clinics in the area of the Central Middlesex Hospital. The two sets of results are almost identical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tables of observed and expected numbers were, therefore, constructed which enabled a comparison to be made between the observed proportions of patients belonging to groups 0 and A in each category of each variable and the numbers that would be expected after adjusting for the effect of the other variables. In fact, none of the four variables introduced much bias into the association between the other variables and the blood groups and so only the uncorrected expectations are given in Tables III, IV, and V. Two sets of data were used for controls: blood group data on 10,000 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of the Central Middlesex Hospital during the years 1947-1951 (Discombe and Meyer, 1952) and on 33,062 blood donors of both sexes, resident in London, and aged 18-60 years, which were collected during 1952-1960(Kopec, 1970. The percentage distributions of the ABO groups in these two control series were identical to one decimal place, and the series were, therefore, combined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%