2011
DOI: 10.1175/2010bams2614.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Canopy Horizontal Array Turbulence Study

Abstract: The Canopy Horizontal Array Turbulence Study (CHATS) took place in spring 2007 and is the third in the series of Horizontal Array Turbulence Study (HATS) experiments. The HATS experiments have been instrumental in testing and developing subfilterscale (SFS) models for large-eddy simulation (LES) of planetary boundary layer (PBL) turbulence. The CHATS campaign took place in a deciduous walnut orchard near Dixon, California, and was designed to examine the impacts of vegetation on SFS turbulence. Measurements we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main source of the problem appears to be with T s not w because w T tc , which uses the same CSAT w , produces reasonable heat fluxes (e.g., predominantly negative at night). Also, similar highfrequency noise in CSAT S T (not shown here) has been observed on a 30-m tower during high winds in the CHATS field project (Patton et al, 2011). This suggests the problem is not specific to the NWT tower.…”
Section: Atmossupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the main source of the problem appears to be with T s not w because w T tc , which uses the same CSAT w , produces reasonable heat fluxes (e.g., predominantly negative at night). Also, similar highfrequency noise in CSAT S T (not shown here) has been observed on a 30-m tower during high winds in the CHATS field project (Patton et al, 2011). This suggests the problem is not specific to the NWT tower.…”
Section: Atmossupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Though estimates of the momentum dispersive flux are reportedly small in the upper canopy (e.g., Poggi et al 2004), these results depend on canopy structure (Moltchanov et al 2011) and need to be verified for sensible heat. Though some of the issues related to small-scale and horizontal transport have been investigated over open snowfields (Parlange et al 2007;Mott et al 2013) and within canopies (e.g., Serafimovich et al 2011;Patton et al 2011;Thomas 2011), we are not aware of any study examining them within a snow-covered forest.…”
Section: B Subcanopy Sensible Heat Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two clear 24-h periods (June 8/9 and May 28/29) with identical mean air temperature (19.3 • C) and similar air temperature spread between daily maximum and minimum (19.8 • C vs. 18.7 • C) were chosen to merge the above-and below-canopy TIR data. Air temperature and relative humidity profiles, as well as H, G, and LE values, were obtained from the Canopy Horizontal Array Turbulence Study (CHATS, Patton et al 2008), a set-up with aspirated temperature and humidity probes, and eddy-covariance flux (EC) measurements at 10 heights on a 30-m tower located in the orchard 116 m north of the TIR camera. In this study we use LE and H from the EC sensors at z = 15 m, and T air and specific humidity w from the aspirated thermocouples and humidity sensors at 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5 and 9 m. G was estimated from a REBS HFT-3 soil heat-flux plate at 0.05-m depth where heat storage in the soil between the soil heat flux plate and the ground surface was obtained through a Hukseflux TP01 thermal property probe and soil temperature measurements at 0.05 m depth.…”
Section: The Chats Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%