2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cancer registry as an ally in monitoring treatment effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite broader inclusion criteria used in EVIDENS, these effectiveness results are in line with those of the CheckMate 017 7 and 057 6 phase III trials and other real-world studies of nivolumab conducted in Europe ( Table 5). [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Examination of the influence of baseline characteristics on OS did not reveal any significant effect of PD-L1 expression, although the analysis may have been underpowered to detect an association given that the sample size of patients in whom PD-L1 expression data were available was small. ECOG PS, smoking status, corticosteroids at baseline, EGFR mutation status, symptomatic brain metastasis and TRAEs significantly influenced OS in nivolumab recipients as seen in our multivariate analysis, even though some of these factors are also well-known prognostic factors in NSCLC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite broader inclusion criteria used in EVIDENS, these effectiveness results are in line with those of the CheckMate 017 7 and 057 6 phase III trials and other real-world studies of nivolumab conducted in Europe ( Table 5). [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Examination of the influence of baseline characteristics on OS did not reveal any significant effect of PD-L1 expression, although the analysis may have been underpowered to detect an association given that the sample size of patients in whom PD-L1 expression data were available was small. ECOG PS, smoking status, corticosteroids at baseline, EGFR mutation status, symptomatic brain metastasis and TRAEs significantly influenced OS in nivolumab recipients as seen in our multivariate analysis, even though some of these factors are also well-known prognostic factors in NSCLC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Instead, data have been reported from small patient cohorts, retrospective studies and early access programs, for which inclusion/exclusion enrollment criteria may be restrictive. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Due to known variation in cancer survival rates across Europe, 28 country-specific data may be more appropriate to describe the real-world experience with nivolumab in the treatment of NSCLC. Furthermore, data collected in the context of a real-world study can also help to address important clinical evidence gaps such as the outcomes in patients who were underrepresented in, or excluded from, pivotal clinical trials of nivolumab due to more severe comorbidities or poor prognostic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lung cancer, it is licensed for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior chemotherapy. Two large randomised studies in patients with advanced non-squamous (NSq) NSCLC (CheckMate057 [3]) and squamous (Sq) NSCLC (CheckMate017 [4]) comparing nivolumab to docetaxel have demonstrated its efficacy at extending overall survival (OS) [5,6], and the interest of nivolumab in treating NSCLC has been confirmed in many subsequent studies in routine clinical practice [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is a valid source of information which may be used to provide additional information to the regulator. 8 In fact, this study showed a very narrow efficacy-effectiveness gap (OS = 12.2 months versus 11.4 months), supporting full licensing of nivolumab.…”
Section: Medicines Financingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Its effectiveness was evaluated through close monitoring of an inception cohort of 115 patients distributed throughout the country. Published data clearly demonstrate that cancer registry is a valid source of information which may be used to provide additional information to the regulator . In fact, this study showed a very narrow efficacy‐effectiveness gap (OS = 12.2 months versus 11.4 months), supporting full licensing of nivolumab.…”
Section: Medicines Financingmentioning
confidence: 64%