2011
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.82.4.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Canadian Rockies and Alberta Network (CRANE): New Constraints on the Rockies and Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

Abstract: The Canadian Rockies and the neighboring Alberta Basin mark the transition from the old North American continental lithosphere (east) to young accreted "terranes" (west). Geologic, seismic, and magnetic data in this region have suggested complex crustal domains, conductive anomalies, and major seismic velocity gradients in the mantle. However, the nature of the boundaries between the basement domains and their vertical extents remains controversial due to the lack of exposed geology and limited seismic and ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, seismic station coverage in western Canada has increased significantly in recent years [e.g., Gu et al, 2011;Novakovic and Atkinson, 2015], where additional stations were deployed for the purposes of monitoring induced earthquakes. Schultz et al [2015a] establish a temporal correlation of > 99.99% between the timing of these operations and c 2016 American Geophysical Union.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the meantime, seismic station coverage in western Canada has increased significantly in recent years [e.g., Gu et al, 2011;Novakovic and Atkinson, 2015], where additional stations were deployed for the purposes of monitoring induced earthquakes. Schultz et al [2015a] establish a temporal correlation of > 99.99% between the timing of these operations and c 2016 American Geophysical Union.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin with a list of 82 events (M 1.8 to M 4.6) from the NRCan Earthquake Catalogue, hereafter NRCan, from December 2013 to June 2015. We obtain waveform data from the TD, RAVEN [Schultz and Stern, 2015], CRANE [Gu et al, 2011], and CN networks (Figure 1), where the majority of the stations have a sampling rate of 100 sps while others are sampled at a rate of 40 sps. After removing instrument response and filtering from 0.5 Hz to the Nyquist frequency, we cut the raw data into four-second windows beginning 0.5 seconds before the respective P-and S-wave arrivals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) by directional kriging. These are data from seismic refraction studies (Bouzidi et al, 2002;Burianyk et al, 1997;Clowes et al, 2002;Fernández-Viejo and Clowes, 2003;Halchuk and Mereu, 1990;Németh et al, 1996Németh et al, , 2005Spence and McLean, 1998;Welford et al, 2001;Zelt and White, 1995) and from teleseismic studies (Gu et al, 2011;Shragge et al, 2002).…”
Section: Model Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This semipermanent network [Gu et al, 2011] was designed to complement the existing stations at Leduc (EDM, Alberta), Waterton Lake (WALA, Alberta), and Sale Mountain (SLEB, British Columbia), three permanent broadband stations from the Canadian National Seismograph Network (CNSN). With average spacing of~150 km between stations, these two arrays provide semiuniform coverage beneath the southern WCSB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…function technique [Langston, 1977;Vinnik, 1977;Ammon, 1991;Ligorria and Ammon, 1999;Cassidy, 1995;Bostock, 1996;Liu et al, 2003;Tauzin et al, 2008;Gu et al, 2011;Thompson et al, 2011], with critical improvements to counteract the high noise levels caused by soft glacial sediments. The short-period nature of receiver functions computed from P-to-S converted waves enables high-resolution constraints on the depth and impedance (the product of density and velocity) contrast of crustal and mantle interfaces beneath the seismic stations (see Rondenay [2009] for review).…”
Section: 1002/2014jb011802mentioning
confidence: 99%