2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cAMP pathway and pain: potential targets for drug development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cAMP pathway in G-protein dependant manner is associated with nociception [53] . Increased cAMP is allied with behavioural symptoms of withdrawal and enhanced action potential in neurons [54] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cAMP pathway in G-protein dependant manner is associated with nociception [53] . Increased cAMP is allied with behavioural symptoms of withdrawal and enhanced action potential in neurons [54] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear role for cyclic AMP has been established in the sensitization of nociceptors and pain projection neurons in the spinal cord after noxious stimulation and inflammation (reviewed in [142,143]). However the AC isoforms that contribute to these processes have been only recently studied.…”
Section: Synaptic Plasticity Associated With Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question still remains as to where AC isoforms are exerting their effects. Pharmacological studies support spinal cord as a major site of action [142]; AC 1 and 5 are expressed in spinal cord in addition to AC 2, 6, and 8 [146]. Although AC1 and AC5 display strong differences in their regulation, both are inhibited by PAM.…”
Section: Synaptic Plasticity Associated With Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the lower dose could activate mPRδ and mPRε, while 16 µg/kg dose would also activate mPRα. Both mPRδ and mPRε are stimulatory G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) that increase in cAMP production (Hanna et al, 2006), which is associated with an increase in nociception (for review see Skyba et al, 2004). We elucidate that 16 ng/kg progesterone dose acting at mPRδ and mPRε would have pronociceptive properties via increased cAMP production, which could explain why this dose did not protect against the return of mechanical allodynia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%