“…The person of Pan Maoming is not part of the traditional canon of key intellectuals, through which Western historiography of philosophy and culture presents and interprets the philosophy, science, and culture of Ancient China to English-speaking readers. The name of Pan Maoming is not mentioned as in solid, time-tested multi-volume editions, for example, The Cambridge History of China (Twitchett & Loewe 1986;Dien & Knapp 2019), as well as in small articles or essays from Chinese studios written in English (Li Rui, 2019). On the one hand, this state seems quite justified, because, no doubts, the figure and theoretical legacy of Pan Maoming is minor compared to such well-known philosophers, scholars, religious, political and cultural actors as Lao-tzu, Confucius, Mo-Tzu, Sun-Tzu, Ming-Tzu, and many others.…”