The Call for Cultural Responsiveness: Teachers' Perceptions about the Interplay Between Culturally Responsive Instruction and Scripted Curricula

Abstract

The increased focus on the implementation of scientifically research-based instruction as an outcome of No Child Left Behind ("Understanding NCLB," 2007) has resulted in the widespread use of scripted reading curricula (Dewitz, Leahy, Jones, and Sullivan, 2010), which typically represents Eurocentric and middle class forms of discourse, knowledge, language, culture, and historical interpretations as academic knowledge (Howard, 2010;Delpit, 2012). In an era where the number of culturally and linguistically diverse students is increasing rapidly (Ginsberg, 2007), it is essential to consider that educational practices relying entirely on prefabricated content may require modification because, as recognized in the funds of knowledge theoretical framework (Veléz-Ibañez, 1988), all students bring a wealth of knowledge to the classroom that should be acknowledged, respected, valued and incorporated into instruction (Gonzalez, Moll, & Amanti, 2005). However, even if teachers are granted the time and permission to modify scripted content in order to build bridges between the prescribed lessons and students' lived experiences, doing so is not easily accomplished when the lives of educators are disconnected from their students (Baeder, 2010). This study investigated the behaviors and ideas teachers have developed as ways to connect with their culturally and linguistically diverse students and their families.Additionally, the study explored how teachers who implement scripted curricula describe the experience of creating culturally responsive lessons intended to specifically connect ii with their culturally and linguistically diverse students and to connect with students' funds of knowledge.This multiple case study describes how five teachers who implement scripted curricula reported their experiences of creating culturally responsive lessons for particular focal students. Findings are presented in individual case narratives followed by a crosscase synthesis. Findings suggest that teachers were able to carry out culturally responsive instructional practices while implementing scripted curricula; however, participants' CARE lessons did not represent Gay's (2010) ethnic and cultural diversity in curriculum content component of culturally responsive instruction. Additionally, findings indicate

Elementary Teacher Candidates' Images of Mathematics, Diverse Students, and Teaching: An Exploratory Study With Implications for Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education

“…Teachers are often required to teach strictly from a scripted teaching guidebook, and "the curriculum" leaves little or no room for culturally responsive teaching. However, Toppel (2013) indicated that teachers can enhance scripted curricula by incorporating some of Gay's (2010) components of culturally responsive instruction without interfering with the integrity of the prescribed lessons. However, the practicing teachers in Toppel's study had extensive training on culturally responsive practices, which may not be true for teacher candidates.…”

Enhancing Core Reading Programs With Culturally Responsive Practices

“…As I started to read books and literature about culturally responsive instruction, I discovered three recurring themes pertaining particularly to culturally responsive reading instruction: (1) culturally appropriate texts, (2) engaging students' voices, and (3) incorporating students' funds of knowledge (Bell & Clark, ; Hefflin, ; Howard, ; Ladson‐Billings, ; Morrison, Robinson, & Gregory Rose, ; Powell, ; Toppel, ). The phrase “funds of knowledge” refers to the knowledge students acquire from their family and cultural background (Lopez, ).…”