1983
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1983.03330260044030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The California Experience With a Diversion Program for Impaired Physicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many state impaired physician programs have now negotiated a significant responsibility for the investigation, intervention, and diversion in reported cases of impairment. 33 34 35…”
Section: Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many state impaired physician programs have now negotiated a significant responsibility for the investigation, intervention, and diversion in reported cases of impairment. 33 34 35…”
Section: Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ported by programs treating physicians varies from 77% 40 to 93%. 41 Even with these optimistic reports, the possibility of a temporary relapse must be anticipated.…”
Section: Signs Of Substance Abuse and Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published studies have reported varying but generally high rates of success for physicians in treatment and monitoring programs (TABLE ). 35,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] However, there are no comparative trials and virtually all reports are based on studies in relatively small, nonrepresentative samples drawn from a single state treatment or monitoring program. In addition, follow-up intervals and definitions of success and methods of assessing it have also varied widely.…”
Section: Box Principles Of Directive Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%