2018
DOI: 10.1080/0020739x.2018.1538466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calculus concept inventory: a psychometric analysis and implications for use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…After this study was undertaken, Gleason et al (2016) published a psychometric analysis outlining weaknesses in the validity of the CCI to measure conceptual knowledge in calculus. Their findings explain that usage of terminology (e.g., "derivative") and notation (e.g., f'(x)) in the CCI items may afford an advantage to students who have already seen calculus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this study was undertaken, Gleason et al (2016) published a psychometric analysis outlining weaknesses in the validity of the CCI to measure conceptual knowledge in calculus. Their findings explain that usage of terminology (e.g., "derivative") and notation (e.g., f'(x)) in the CCI items may afford an advantage to students who have already seen calculus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective was to have a tool for population-scale comparisons of samples of responses from students who experiences two different modes of instruction. There has been very limited work on the validity analysis of Epstein's Calculus Concept Inventory, but there are no other calculus concept inventories at this time (Gleason et al, 2015(Gleason et al, , 2018. Carlson and collaborators developed a Precalculus Concept Assessment and a Calculus Concept Readiness instrument, both focused on precalculus concepts (Carlson et al, 2010(Carlson et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlson and collaborators developed a Precalculus Concept Assessment and a Calculus Concept Readiness instrument, both focused on precalculus concepts (Carlson et al, 2010(Carlson et al, , 2015. Gleason et al (2018) critiqued the Calculus Concept Inventory, concluding that their data, from 1800 students enrolled in Calculus 1 courses, were consistent with a unidimensional model but expressing concerns about its content validity and reliability. The focus in their analysis was not on the comparision of alternative modes of instruction, which was the reason for which the inventory was developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations