1962
DOI: 10.1016/0041-5553(62)90062-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calculation of the interaction of non-stationary shock waves and obstacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
451
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
451
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure is then computed iteratively by solving an elliptic equation, and the velocity components are projected onto the divergence-free space, thus recovering the incompressible sought solution. The advective fluxes are discretised by the Rusanov flux (Rusanov 1961;Drikakis and Rider 2004), and similar to the compressible case the fifth-order MUSCL scheme has been used for reconstructing the cell-face variables. For the time integration, a second-order Runge-Kutta method in its Strong-Stability-Preserving version (Spiteri and Ruuth 2002), has been employed in conjunction with CFL numbers of 0.2 and 0.5 for the incompressible and compressible solvers, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure is then computed iteratively by solving an elliptic equation, and the velocity components are projected onto the divergence-free space, thus recovering the incompressible sought solution. The advective fluxes are discretised by the Rusanov flux (Rusanov 1961;Drikakis and Rider 2004), and similar to the compressible case the fifth-order MUSCL scheme has been used for reconstructing the cell-face variables. For the time integration, a second-order Runge-Kutta method in its Strong-Stability-Preserving version (Spiteri and Ruuth 2002), has been employed in conjunction with CFL numbers of 0.2 and 0.5 for the incompressible and compressible solvers, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux polynomial in each element is extrapolated to the interfaces, giving left and right flux states f L and f R on each side of the interface. A common numerical flux f * is found at each interface using an approximate Riemann solver such as the Rusanov [43] or Roe method [30] for the inviscid flux and the LDG method [44] for the viscous flux. The next step is to construct a globally continuous flux polynomial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They clearly reveal the emergence of a liquid column bounded by two closely spaced shocks, giving us confidence that we are witnessing the birth of what would become a delta-shock in the limit as F → ∞. For finite F , the shallow water equations (1.1), (1.2) remain non-degenerate as a hyperbolic system and the numerical solutions were obtained using finite volume techniques for hyperbolic systems, the local LaxFriedrichs or Rusanov (1961) scheme, and its second order extension by Kurganov & Tadmor (2000). Neither scheme requires the solution of the Riemann problem, only the determination of the fluxes as functions of the conserved variables η and ηu, and a bound on the maximum wave speed, taken as |u| + √ η/F .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%