Algorithms and Order 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2639-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Calculation of Invariants for Ordered Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a plan-library Π, one potential approach to that end is to obtain the plan-library Π ′ consisting of all linear extensions of plan-rules in Π, and then use Π ′ as the input into Algorithm 1 (Summ). We could use existing, fast algorithms to generate linear extensions [17], or consider simpler plan-rules corresponding to restricted classes of partially ordered sets [4]. Finally, it would be interesting to formally characterise the restricted class of domains in which the presented algorithms are complete.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given a plan-library Π, one potential approach to that end is to obtain the plan-library Π ′ consisting of all linear extensions of plan-rules in Π, and then use Π ′ as the input into Algorithm 1 (Summ). We could use existing, fast algorithms to generate linear extensions [17], or consider simpler plan-rules corresponding to restricted classes of partially ordered sets [4]. Finally, it would be interesting to formally characterise the restricted class of domains in which the presented algorithms are complete.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 1 (Ranking) A ranking for a plan-library Π is a function RΠ : EΠ → N0 from event-goal types mentioned in Π to natural numbers, such that for all event-goals e1, e2 ∈ EΠ where e2 is the same type as some e3 ∈ children(e1, Π), we have that RΠ(e1) > RΠ(e2). 4 In addition, we define the following two related notions: first, given an event-goal type e, RΠ(e) denotes the rank of e in Π; and second, given any event-goal e(t) mentioned in Π, we define RΠ(e(t)) = RΠ(e(x)) (where |x| = |t|), i.e., the rank of an event-goal is equivalent to the rank of its type. In order that these and other definitions also apply to event-goal programs, we sometimes blur the distinction between eventgoals e and event-goal programs !e.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2. Indeed, the following theorem is an 9 Recall that a linear extension of a partial order (C, <) is a total order (C, < ) such that a~(b~a < b.…”
Section: The Hierarchy Of Distributed Computation Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If G is a graph then by G k we denote the graph with the same vertex set as G but which has an edge between every pair of vertices that are connected by a path of length at most k in G. In other words, if M is the incidence matrix of G, then M k is the incidence matrix of G k , where arithmetic is done mod 2. The cube of G is G 3 and the square of G is G 2 . A poset P has a delay k ordering if and only if G 0 (P) k is Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Strategy and De Nitions A Popular Strategy For E Ciently Gementioning
confidence: 99%